Teams

SFV - The Breakfast Club

2024 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-10vs SFV LLW - Wyld Holes - Neal SkuroLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Castillo / Todd Nagler vs Zachary Jones / Jason Gorman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCesar Garcia / Todd Nagler vs Zachary Jones / Bruce Man-Son-Hing4-6, 5-7
2024-10-12vs SFV LLW - Wyld Holes - Neal SkuroLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Castillo / Todd Nagler vs Zachary Jones / Daniel Sutman6-7, 4-6
2024-09-29vs SFV LLW - Wyld Holes - Neal SkuroWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Mason / Todd Nagler vs Jason Gorman / Ivan Salazar6-3, 6-2
2024-09-22vs SFV LLW - Wyld Holes - Neal SkuroLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Mason / Ethan Do vs Shane Garrett / Hirsch Matani7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConrad Chilcott / Nicolas Stansbury vs Jason Gorman / William Knox6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrandon Joe / Joseph Tchan vs Zachary Jones / Adam Scott3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Aidan Adham
published 5
4.33
Todd Nagler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Joseph Tchan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Conrad Chilcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Ik Jun
published
4.23
Sebastien Damas
published
4.21
Michael Marley
published
4.19
Nicolas Stansbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Joe Chan
published
3.71
Gene Park
published
Ethan Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Frederik Vig
published
Shawn Hatosy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Aidan Adham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.38
4.5
Todd Nagler
71W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Joseph Tchan
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Conrad Chilcott
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ik Jun
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Sebastien Damas
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Michael Marley
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Nicolas Stansbury
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%9%91%
4.19
Joe Chan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.00
Gene Park
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Ethan Do
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Frederik Vig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Hatosy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.