Teams

Broward/Alaina

2025 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-04vs Ltc/SauermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Nastasha Rodriguez vs Camila Giraldo / Amy Sauerman6-0, 6-3
2025-09-28vs Ltc/SauermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanine Burke / Daniela Gonzalez vs Erin Manten / Melissa Leighton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Nastasha Rodriguez vs Sheri Puppo / Naisha Joseph3-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs Ltc/SauermanWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Nastasha Rodriguez vs Naisha Joseph / Erin Manten6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Ramos / Janine Burke vs Victoria Baca / Camila Giraldo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-30vs Ltc/SauermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Nastasha Rodriguez vs Camila Giraldo / Sheri Puppo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-23vs Ltc/SauermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanine Burke / Daniela Gonzalez vs Naisha Joseph / Amy Sauerman6-4, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Nastasha Rodriguez
published
4.64
Windy Dees
published
4.41
Sharon Runk
published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cheryl Hicks
published 4.5
4.23
Gabriela Castanon
published 4.5
4.13
Krista Geoffrion
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz + Gabriela Castanon431856% games+4.2% vs expected
Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz + Janine Burke201253% games+3.7% vs expected
Sharon Runk + Krista Geoffrion1449% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Runk + Janine Burke3247% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Runk + Gabriela Castanon303 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Castanon + Janine Burke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nastasha Rodriguez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.71
Windy Dees
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.64
4.5
Sharon Runk
136W–58L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz
191W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Cheryl Hicks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Gabriela Castanon
255W–104L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Krista Geoffrion
31W–36L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.