Teams

Williams, Cindy

2025 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-08vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Sims / Anna Lucovich vs Kari Thomas / Kaiti Stewart1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hale / Danette Tannehill vs BRITTANY MORALES / Olivia Barnard1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Matthews / Allison Wallace vs Charlotte Crisler / Stephanie Bailey0-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanette Tannehill / Jill Miller vs Chrystal Gray / Kim Maureen Price7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Lucovich / Allison Sims vs Camille Horton / Candice Ross3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Matthews / Ricka Hill vs Stephanie Jierski / Elaine Manuel2-6, 0-6
2025-09-17vs Mangum, EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Sims / Anna Lucovich vs Emily Mangum / Rose Edmonston1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanette Tannehill / Suzy Hays vs Mary Kennedy Hand / Summer Morrissette1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Ford / Nikki Summers vs Kristi Thompson / Gabrielle Smith5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-10vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Hale / Lisa Wheat vs Camille Horton / Candice Ross6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmilie Lynn / Nikki Summers vs Kim Maureen Price / Chrystal Gray4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Matthews / Ricka Hill vs Elaine Manuel / Stephanie Jierski1-6, 0-6
2025-09-03vs Bayati, MitraLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Wallace / Kelli Ford vs Kari Thomas / Jasmine Houston2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hale / Lisa Wheat vs Ronjanett Taylor / BRITTANY MORALES2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmilie Lynn / Nikki Summers vs Timika Franklin / Cece Sherrod7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Mangum, EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Ford / Danette Tannehill vs Emily Mangum / Summer Morrissette2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Sims / Anna Lucovich vs Merry Farris / Mary Lauren Boykin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Matthews / Ricka Hill vs Chasity Barksdale / Meredith Delaune0-6, 1-6
2025-08-20vs Manuel, ElaineLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Hale / Lisa Wheat vs Camille Horton / Chrystal Gray6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelli Ford / Jill Miller vs Stephanie Jierski / Candice Ross6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNikki Summers / Emilie Lynn vs Elaine Manuel / Kim Maureen Price6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-13vs Bayati, MitraLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Matthews / Allison Wallace vs BRITTANY MORALES / Kaiti Stewart2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Hale / Danette Tannehill vs Stephanie Bailey / Taylor Spillman6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Martin Williams / Ricka Hill vs Jasmine Houston / Charlotte Crisler2-6, 3-6
2025-08-06vs Mangum, EmilyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Hale / Lisa Wheat vs Emily Mangum / Mary Kennedy Hand6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Sims / Anna Lucovich vs Rose Edmonston / Meredith Delaune7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Manuel, Elaine54111635245
2Williams, Cindy1872041281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Kelli Ford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Allison Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Danette Tannehill
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.31
Susan Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Nikki Summers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Anna Lucovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.06
Emilie Lynn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.05
Cindy Martin Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.90
Allison Sims
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Julie Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ricka Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzy Hays
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Sims + Anna Lucovich1928% games−12.0% vs expected
Emilie Lynn + Nikki Summers033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Wallace + Julie Matthews033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Matthews + Ricka Hill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Ford
28W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Allison Wallace
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Danette Tannehill
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Susan Hale
15W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Nikki Summers
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Anna Lucovich
10W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Emilie Lynn
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Cindy Martin Williams
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Allison Sims
4W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Julie Matthews
0W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricka Hill
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzy Hays
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.