Teams

Bracey - Salem Country Club

2024 Virginia Beach Combo · Virginia Beach Combo 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-27vs McMahon - Beat JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesShunsuke Araki / Dean Justin Nunez vs Kevin Kopf / Brian Sweitzer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-20vs McMahon - Beat JamesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Bracey / Shunsuke Araki vs Kevin Kopf / Brian Sweitzer6-7, 4-6
2024-10-13vs McMahon - Beat JamesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDean Justin Nunez / Patrick Conde vs Michael McMahon / Justin Pierce6-7, 4-6
2024-10-06vs McMahon - Beat JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Bracey / Shunsuke Araki vs Josh Pierce / Justin Pierce6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-29vs McMahon - Beat JamesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDean Justin Nunez / Patrick Conde vs Casey Hardie / Brian Sweitzer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-22vs McMahon - Beat JamesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatrick Conde / Rainfredo Bautista vs Mitchell Perry / Josh Pierce6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJames Bracey / Shunsuke Araki vs Casey Hardie / Michael McMahon4-6, 2-6
2024-09-15vs McMahon - Beat JamesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTal Covington / Shunsuke Araki vs William Graham / Justin Pierce0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dean Justin Nunez
published 4.5
3.85
Patrick Conde
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.85
Shunsuke Araki
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.72
James Bracey
published
3.64
Michael Erguiza
published
3.59
Chris Sabalburo
published 4
Miguel Sierra
published
Rainfredo Bautista
published
Tal Covington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shunsuke Araki + Patrick Conde16558% games+8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dean Justin Nunez
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Patrick Conde
42W–26L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Shunsuke Araki
87W–45L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
James Bracey
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
Michael Erguiza
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Chris Sabalburo
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Miguel Sierra
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rainfredo Bautista
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tal Covington
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.