Teams

Furnish/Owens/Benton

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-29vs Brown/LRWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Chang / Marilynn Nabholz vs Ruth Narveson / Cathy Green6-0, 6-4
2023-09-28vs Fisher/MHWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Marilynn Nabholz vs Nancy Decker / Phyllis Venable6-3, 6-1
2023-09-28vs Braswell/HSVWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Chang / Marilynn Nabholz vs Patti Peeler / Joanne Chambers6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Lisa Hammersly
published
3.28
Brenda Scheffler
published 3.5
3.28
Marilynn Nabholz
published
3.22
Judy Furnish
published
3.17
Vicki Kovaleski
published
3.17
Linda Ring
published
3.13
Kate Hickey
published
3.11
Donna Owens
published
3.10
Lisa Chang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dena Wenzler
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Furnish + Brenda Scheffler7754% games+2.3% vs expected
Lisa Hammersly + Vicki Kovaleski5352% games−0.5% vs expected
Marilynn Nabholz + Lisa Chang224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Hammersly
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Scheffler
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Marilynn Nabholz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Judy Furnish
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Vicki Kovaleski
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Linda Ring
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Kate Hickey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Donna Owens
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lisa Chang
101W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Dena Wenzler
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.