Teams

Westchase - T. Ashour

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Machonis / Raquel Pullaro vs Asha Grover / Fabiola Morales2-6, 2-6
2023-08-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Lee / Raquel Pullaro vs Kara Buchholz-Ashenbaugh / Sheryl Cornell6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Figueroa / Raquel Pullaro vs Jihea Helme / Alyson Thomas6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-27vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Lee / Raquel Pullaro vs Alessandra Giraldo / Kelley Coffey3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Trina Ashour vs Asha Grover / Denise Stone6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSummer Popejoy / Marisol Cohen vs Neha Bishnoi / Kathleen Duran7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Lennox / Katie Lee vs Claudia George / Siwon Jang6-1, 6-2
2023-06-22vs Hills/M. Barry/18&Over5.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarisol Cohen / Raquel Pullaro vs Stephanie van Brocklin / Michelle Barry0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Machonis / Sarah Perron vs Audrey Kessler / Christy Seal2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Anne Marie Lennox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Marisol Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Laura Bleacher
published
2.68
Raquel Pullaro
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Trina Ashour
published
2.58
Chet Gowda
published 3
2.58
Emelia Flitman
published
2.56
Kelly Machonis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Caroline Magria
published 3
Summer Popejoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisol Cohen + Kelly Machonis4645% games−2.7% vs expected
Emelia Flitman + Chet Gowda2543% games−3.4% vs expected
Marisol Cohen + Anne Marie Lennox131354% gamesnot enough data
Anne Marie Lennox + Kelly Machonis6356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Marie Lennox
133W–91L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Marisol Cohen
59W–109L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Laura Bleacher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Trina Ashour
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Chet Gowda
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Emelia Flitman
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Kelly Machonis
48W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Caroline Magria
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
Summer Popejoy
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.