Teams

Acers

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-20vs SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Gibau / Larry McCollum vs Charles Wardell / Ian Jones7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKudzai Mukushi vs Mark Fauntleroy0-6, 6-7
2022-07-20vs SmashersLost 01
L#1 SinglesKudzai Mukushi vs Shawn Drury1-6, 0-6
2022-07-16vs SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesLarry McCollum / Steven Gibau vs Charles Wardell / Ian Jones7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKudzai Mukushi vs Mark Fauntleroy0-6, 6-7
2022-07-10vs SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLarry McCollum / Steven Gibau vs Charles Wardell / Horace Martin6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Thomas Swann
published
David Murray
published 3.5
3.12
Rudolph Isaac
published
3.04
Brian Lynch
published 3
3.02
Steven Gibau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Larry McCollum
published
2.91
Bill Keating
published 3
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.75
Kudzai Mukushi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.53
Brian Stanley
published 3
2.52
Melvin Williams
published
Matthew Warren
published
Scott Womack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kudzai Mukushi + Bill Keating4355% games+5.0% vs expected
Brian Lynch + Matthew Warren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Swann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
David Murray
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rudolph Isaac
46W–25L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Brian Lynch
64W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Steven Gibau
167W–242L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Larry McCollum
7W–24L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Kudzai Mukushi
44W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brian Stanley
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Melvin Williams
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Matthew Warren
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Womack
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.