Teams

Hills - Temple Terrace Hawks/Warrener

2022 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-06vs Temple Terrace Bees - A. MartiniSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Costanza / Samuel Rosenbleeth vs Don Gettner / John Niles6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRobert Chen / Lawrence Palombo vs Albert Harrell / Richard J Derr3-6, 0-6
2022-02-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Chen / Chris Wiley vs Albert Martini / Toi Phan6-0, 6-0
2022-02-20vs Temple Terrace Bees - A. MartiniWon 20
W#2 DoublesRobert Chen / Lawrence Palombo vs Don Gettner / Daniel Shields7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRick Burkhart / Patrick Rairigh vs Gary Walker / Thomas Weber3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-06vs Temple Terrace Bees - A. MartiniSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Costanza / Samuel Rosenbleeth vs Albert Harrell / Richard J Derr2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesByron Gibbs Wilson / Patrick Rairigh vs Daniel Shields / Don Gettner6-1, 6-1
2022-01-30vs Temple Terrace Bees - A. MartiniWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Costanza / Patrick Rairigh vs Albert Harrell / Richard J Derr6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-23vs Temple Terrace Bees - A. MartiniSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Byron Gibbs Wilson vs Thomas Weber / Gary Walker6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLawrence Palombo / Robert Chen vs Albert Harrell / Richard J Derr3-6, 5-7
2022-01-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Wiley / Robert Chen vs Albert Martini / Toi Phan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

George Hawkins
published 3.5
3.15
Patrick Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Lawrence Palombo
published
3.13
Robert Chen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Rick Burkhart
published
Michael Costanza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Costanza + Patrick Rairigh12658% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Michael Costanza4155% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Patrick Rairigh213 matchesnot enough data
Lawrence Palombo + Rick Burkhart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Lawrence Palombo
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Robert Chen
158W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Rick Burkhart
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Michael Costanza
129W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.