Teams

Fischels ES 2025

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 8.0 MX (FRI)

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-20vs HANSEN 8.0 MXD ESLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn Reidinger / Brian Reidinger vs Sarah Curfman / David Komula6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-12-13vs Estey - 8.0 Mixed ES2025Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Genevieve Swanson / Sean Zindren6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-12-06vs Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Jeffrey Moe / Mallory Lithun5-7, 4-6
2024-11-15vs Henrich/Von SeggernWon 10
W#3 DoublesBjorn Bjorklund / Dawn Reidinger vs Jim Wagner / Sandra Stromberg6-3, 6-0
2024-11-08vs Jones/ShemyakinLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Natalie Prittinen / Thomas Prittinen3-6, 4-6
2024-10-25vs HANSEN 8.0 MXD ESWon 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Reidinger / Brian Reidinger vs Jennifer Lewis / David Komula2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-18vs Estey - 8.0 Mixed ES2025Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Bradley Simon / Andrea Boado2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-11vs Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia White / David Neis vs Isabel Thiner / Matthew McCann1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Fischels / Jon Swanson vs Betsy Sedlak / Mike Smith5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLorraine Hulbert / Bjorn Bjorklund vs Megan Pant / Ajay Pant6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bjorn Bjorklund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
David Neis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Lindsay Dean
published
Dick Nelson
published 4
3.74
Brian Reidinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Lorraine Hulbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Angela Fischels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Jon Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Patricia White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Dawn Reidinger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Taylor Hanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Reidinger + Brian Reidinger82142% games+1.8% vs expected
Patricia White + David Neis51043% games−8.3% vs expected
Bjorn Bjorklund + Lorraine Hulbert2544% games−8.5% vs expected
Angela Fischels + David Neis1440% games−9.7% vs expected
Angela Fischels + Jon Swanson2645% gamesnot enough data
Angela Fischels + Brian Reidinger134 matchesnot enough data
Bjorn Bjorklund + Angela Fischels033 matchesnot enough data
Jon Swanson + Lorraine Hulbert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bjorn Bjorklund
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
David Neis
11W–21L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
Lindsay Dean
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Dick Nelson
0W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brian Reidinger
92W–175L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Lorraine Hulbert
50W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Angela Fischels
46W–79L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jon Swanson
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Patricia White
42W–69L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dawn Reidinger
111W–146L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Taylor Hanson
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.