Teams

BSF:Tri that Ace:Albera/Song

2023 NCT Tri Level Women · 4.5 Tri Level Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-02vs NHHR:Barnyard Cats:Condit/Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristyna Zeman / Christie Albera vs Jennifer MacAinag / Jennifer Noonan3-6, 3-6
2023-10-21vs BSF:Bowers:bowers/Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristyna Zeman / Xianyuan Song vs Melanie Bowers / Kelli Bastiaanse6-1, 6-1
2023-10-14vs NHHR:Barnyard Cats:Condit/Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Marum / Joanna Tysko vs Jennifer MacAinag / Jennifer Noonan4-6, 6-5
2023-09-30vs NHHR:Barnyard Cats:Condit/Won 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Marum / Joanna Tysko vs Julie Condit / Jennifer Noonan7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Tri Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Bowers:bowers/0202424
2NHHR:Barnyard Cats:Condit/0421231
3BSF:Tri that Ace:Albera/Song0421333

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Joanna Tysko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Kristyna Zeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Christie Albera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Courtney Marum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Xianyuan Song
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Albera + Kristyna Zeman7357% games+5.3% vs expected
Xianyuan Song + Kristyna Zeman5453% games+4.8% vs expected
Courtney Marum + Joanna Tysko8259% games+3.9% vs expected
Christie Albera + Courtney Marum5154% games+2.7% vs expected
Christie Albera + Xianyuan Song11557% games+1.4% vs expected
Xianyuan Song + Joanna Tysko2439% games−10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanna Tysko
45W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
4.36
Kristyna Zeman
43W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Christie Albera
101W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Courtney Marum
116W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Xianyuan Song
113W–75L career · 1 line in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.