Teams

CCW MICHON

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-27vs CSRC PARKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAugie Mendoza / Daniel Michon vs Michael Park / Craig Rogers2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesVictor Struski vs Ryan Hill6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Wayne Mo vs Thad Fineran / Michael White7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Sabelstrom / David Illsley vs Mike Guinn / Travis Anderson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-13vs LTFCS CORDASCOLost 14
L#1 DoublesDaniel Michon / Jeff Mailloux vs Ben Lowe / Michael Blevin1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Struski vs Jeff Hensley1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Sabelstrom / Jon Mills vs Keith Logeman / Alex Praser3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesWayne Mo vs Josh Swenson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Whipple / George York vs MICHAEL REECE / Cory Rogers6-3, 6-2
2026-05-06vs FLYHS JONESWon 32
W#1 DoublesDaniel Michon / Jon Mills vs Chase Campbell / Mike Hjelkrem6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVictor Struski vs Eric Davis6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Erik Drake vs Diogo Carvalho / Steve Jones3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWayne Mo vs Aaron Pring6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Whipple / George York vs Matt Campbell / James Fradette5-7, 6-7
2026-04-29vs PBCP CRUZLost 23
L#1 DoublesDaniel Michon / Chris Sabelstrom vs Guy Cruz / Don Beauvais3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesVictor Struski vs Brayden Gonzales6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Augie Mendoza vs Brad Matthews / Manuel Briceno4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Bolin vs Nik Matthews6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Whipple / George York vs Michael Fipps / Craig Lytle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-24vs FLYHS JONESLost 14
L#1 DoublesChris Sabelstrom / Augie Mendoza vs James Fradette / Diogo Carvalho0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesWayne Mo vs Eric Davis1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Jon Mills vs Steve Jones / Ken Lane0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesVictor Struski vs Matt Campbell6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Illsley / Erik Drake vs Sean Hawkins / Mike Hjelkrem7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-22vs CSRC PARKLost 23
L#1 DoublesChris Sabelstrom / Wayne Mo vs Craig Rogers / Michael Park4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Struski vs Ryan Hill5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Michon / Augie Mendoza vs John Abbott / Russell Walters6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDavid Illsley vs Michael White6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Whipple / Erik Drake vs Bob Ziuchkovski / Travis Anderson6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Daniel Bolin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
David Illsley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.84
Daniel Michon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
John Whipple
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Wayne Mo
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Victor Struski
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.65
George York
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Augie Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Chris Sabelstrom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Erik Drake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Jeff Mailloux
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Jon Mills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Mailloux + Erik Drake1450% games−0.4% vs expected
John Whipple + George York7451% games−0.7% vs expected
Daniel Michon + Wayne Mo6065% gamesnot enough data
Chris Sabelstrom + David Illsley134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Michon + Jeff Mailloux134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Michon + Augie Mendoza224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Bolin
3W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
David Illsley
101W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Daniel Michon
98W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
John Whipple
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Wayne Mo
45W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Victor Struski
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.68
George York
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Augie Mendoza
26W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Chris Sabelstrom
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Erik Drake
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jeff Mailloux
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Jon Mills
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.