Teams

CSRC REYNOLDS

2024 ITA MIXED - SOCO · MIXED 5.5 - ITA - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-25vs CSCC PEPPERWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra VanDeVeer / Travis Anderson vs Sutton Spanton / Amadee Pepper6-2, 6-3
2024-08-25vs CSCC GATELEYLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeonard Green / Ceanne Coleman vs Laura Dimberio / Keith Oppenheim5-7, 3-6
2024-08-11vs CSCC GATELEYWon 10
W#2 DoublesLuis Baars / Debra VanDeVeer vs Genevieve Deegan / William Deegan6-2, 6-2
2024-07-28vs CSCC GATELEYWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeonard Green / Ceanne Coleman vs Janet Mulvaney / Keith Oppenheim6-0, 6-1
2024-07-21vs CCW WARDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Debra VanDeVeer vs Maggie Ward / Rick Sundahl6-0, 6-1
2024-07-21vs CSCC GATELEYWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Ceanne Coleman vs Janet Mulvaney / Keith Oppenheim6-1, 6-3
2024-07-14vs CSCC GATELEYWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Ceanne Coleman vs Melissa Gateley / Jordan Gateley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuis Baars / Debra VanDeVeer vs Genevieve Deegan / William Deegan7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 5.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jennifer Peck
published
2.98
Michael Reynolds
published
2.94
David Wooten
published 3
2.83
Leonard Green
published
2.78
Kristina Kyle
published
2.77
Luis Baars
published
2.77
Debra VanDeVeer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Ceanne Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Rachel Ross
published
2.43
Andrea Pazdera
published 2.5
2.38
Amy Wooten
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra VanDeVeer + David Wooten4355% games+3.2% vs expected
Andrea Pazdera + Michael Reynolds3351% games−8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Peck
31W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Michael Reynolds
33W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
David Wooten
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Leonard Green
33W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Kristina Kyle
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Luis Baars
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debra VanDeVeer
48W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ceanne Coleman
37W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Rachel Ross
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
Andrea Pazdera
14W–29L career · no lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Amy Wooten
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.