Teams

KY/LOU/MAZZONI/HAMILTON

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-06vs KY/LOU/POLTER/DALTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Klein / Diane Schuhmann vs Mary Shively / Caroline Oneill1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Gunn / Fran Ferrell vs Tammy Pollock / Christine Montgomery2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Marsh / Gina Milliner vs Mary Conder / Stephanie Kellerman2-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs KY/LOU/PZREWORSKI/LANELost 02
L#1 DoublesLucy Goodrow / Diane Schuhmann vs Kathleen Johnson / Kathleen Lane0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Klein / Amy Lampton vs Sharen Hayden / Judette Baylon2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Rhonda Richardson
published
Diane Schuhmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Denise Puthuff
published 3.5
3.05
Carolyn Hoge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Dianna Mazzoni
published 3
2.94
Susan Gunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lolly Buckingham
published
2.76
Amy Lampton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Gayle Ciliberti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Karen Quinkert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Fran Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Donna Wendell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Lisa Marsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gina Milliner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lucy Goodrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Lampton + Fran Ferrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Richardson
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Diane Schuhmann
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Denise Puthuff
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carolyn Hoge
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Dianna Mazzoni
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Susan Gunn
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Lolly Buckingham
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amy Lampton
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Gayle Ciliberti
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Karen Quinkert
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Fran Ferrell
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Donna Wendell
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Lisa Marsh
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Gina Milliner
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lucy Goodrow
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.