Teams

Hills - HCC Rip and Sip/Dinh

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-28vs Tampa Palms No Names - M. AdamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Voelker / David Voelker vs Matt Permuth / Wei Xue6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJane Maxwell / Chi Ming Yu vs Doug Angelone / Julie Sakre4-6, 1-6
2021-03-14vs Arbor Greene - B. HartWon 10
W#2 DoublesChi Ming Yu / Nelci Rodrigues vs Tom Layton / Denys Hubbard6-3, 6-3
2021-03-07vs Hunters Green - S. HunterWon 10
W#2 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / David Voelker vs Tibbie Farnsworth / Matthew Warren6-3, 6-2
2021-02-21vs Tampa Palms No Names - M. AdamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Chi Ming Yu vs Tara Skendziel / Andrew Fisher6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Kelly Armagost vs Wei Xue / Matt Permuth6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-02-14vs Cheval Aces and Sevens - N. MartinezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Nelci Rodrigues vs Marvin Jones / Lorrie White6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChi Ming Yu / Jane Maxwell vs Jason Crow / Lisa Crow6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-01-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Dustin Applebaum vs Naomi Bailey / Paul Williams6-7, 5-7
2021-01-24vs Buckhorn Mixed BagWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Nelci Rodrigues vs Christopher Lucas / Susan MOSHER6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-01-17vs HCC Spoilers - M. PalmerWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Nelci Rodrigues vs Simon Amesbury / Pippin Gilbert6-0, 6-2
2021-01-10vs Hunters Green - S. HunterWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Maxwell / David Voelker vs Tibbie Farnsworth / Sean Friday6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.65
David Voelker
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Dustin Applebaum
published 3.5
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.37
Jane Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Nelci Rodrigues
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Voelker + Nelci Rodrigues314 matchesnot enough data
David Voelker + Melissa Voelker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 7 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%22%78%
3.60
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jane Maxwell
114W–96L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Nelci Rodrigues
201W–129L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.