Teams

Pelczar COMPASS POINTE

2026 South East Tennis Singles 55 & Over League · 3.5 Men 55 & over

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-27vs MacCallLost 01
L#2 SinglesFranklin Cassada vs Doug MacCall7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-19vs Walker St. JamesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTim Pelczar vs Donald Murphy6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesFranklin Cassada vs Chip Yost4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-19vs Walker St. JamesWon 30
W#1 SinglesTim Pelczar vs Kevin Daly6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesFranklin Cassada vs Jeff Walker6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMichael Gould vs Timothy O'Connor7-6, 6-3
2026-02-18vs Kysely SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesTim Pelczar vs Deric Weiss1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCasey Carr vs Michael Caropolo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-09vs Kysely SinglesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCasey Carr vs Gregor Kysely7-5, 7-5
L#3 SinglesMichael Gould vs Peter Weppler3-6, 1-6
2026-01-26vs MacCallLost 03
L#1 SinglesTim Pelczar vs Steven Kolb6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCasey Carr vs Doug MacCall6-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesDavid Paul vs Edward Pringle4-6, 6-7
2026-01-21vs Kysely SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTim Pelczar vs Deric Weiss2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMichael Gould vs Jim Crotty5-7, 4-6
2026-01-17vs MacCallSplit 11
L#1 SinglesFranklin Cassada vs Paul Friedland2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesDavid Paul vs Daniel Weese7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men 55 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pelczar COMPASS POINTE54151228232
2Walker St. James45121532259
3Kysely Singles1751939259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Tim Pelczar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Casey Carr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Franklin Cassada
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Donald Cooke
published 3.5
3.05
Michael Gould
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.01
David Paul
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Pelczar + Franklin Cassada12361% games+4.2% vs expected
Franklin Cassada + David Paul314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Pelczar
38W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Casey Carr
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Franklin Cassada
51W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Donald Cooke
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Gould
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
David Paul
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.