← Teams

MAC-Lochner

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.31 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dalika Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Marilyn von Bergen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristin Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Nicolle Lochner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Kathleen Cooney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Wendy Hill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Sara Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Barbara Gram vs Jing Li / Nancy Osborne6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Campbell / Marilyn von Bergen vs Susan Browning / Lisa Cohns6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Christine Brecht vs Jayne Mitchell / Penny Shaw6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Sara Weinstein vs Patricia Morrison / Michele Waite6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Brecht / Kathleen Cooney vs Cecile Bamer / Shirley Derby6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMarilyn von Bergen / Wendy Hill vs Julie Arness / Tuni Stecker6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-29Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesKristin Campbell / Caroline Hall vs Jennifer Trank / Nancy Kane6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Hill / Nicolle Lochner vs Chris van Leeuwen / Mary Beth Thomsen6-3, 7-5
2023-10-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCaroline Hall / Kristin Campbell vs Catherine Leedy / Janae Pyle6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Hill / Nicolle Lochner vs Julie Kim / Kim Wright7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Koerner / Marilyn von Bergen vs Deb Garris / Gretchen Wagner6-0, 7-5
2023-10-22Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesMarilyn von Bergen / Kathleen Cooney vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Laura Shier6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDalika Crawford / Barbara Gram vs Catherine Greenblatt / Betty Roux6-1, 6-4
2023-10-20Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Christine Brecht vs Inge Marshall / Heather MacPherson6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Hill / Nicolle Lochner vs Caryn Cohen / Nancy Collins7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Sara Weinstein vs Bernadette Lisac / Kerry Sanford6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKristin Campbell / Barbara Gram vs Sandra Ellis / Susie Garland3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-17Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesKristin Campbell / Cathy Koerner vs Kathy Ramsey / Maryke Schmidt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Barbara Gram vs Janice Ackley / Donna Klindt6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Dalika Crawford
60W–40L career
0%89%11%
3.45
3.5
Marilyn von Bergen
20W–23L career
11%88%2%
3.19
3.5
Kristin Campbell
32W–52L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3.5
Nicolle Lochner
36W–73L career
25%74%1%
3.09
3.5
Kathleen Cooney
47W–71L career
31%69%0%
3.01
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Wendy Hill
34W–48L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Sara Weinstein
12W–27L career
1%98%1%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.