Teams

OC YLCC- Claudia

2023 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

20 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Candice Myers
published 4
3.74
3.34
Sandy Swearingen
published
3.34
Monica Kirby
published
3.29
Sandra Patel
published
3.26
Nancy Phillipi
published
3.26
Michaela Ehrle
published
Claire Mayer
published 3.5
Erin Freimann
published 3.5
3.24
Joy Skillman
published
3.23
Mischa King
published
3.23
Laura Whitten
published
3.21
Rebecca Budai
published
3.11
Sandra Barnette
published
3.09
Nancy Montez
published
3.08
Sarah Huff
published
3.02
Jennifer Rodrigues
published
3.01
Melissa McCullough
published
2.98
Vivian Noble
published
Leslie Acevedo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa McCullough + Michaela Ehrle5450% games+5.9% vs expected
Sandra Barnette + Mischa King10457% games+0.7% vs expected
Melissa McCullough + Sandra Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candice Myers
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Claudia Spaulding
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Sandy Swearingen
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
Monica Kirby
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Nancy Phillipi
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Michaela Ehrle
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Claire Mayer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Erin Freimann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joy Skillman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Mischa King
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Laura Whitten
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Rebecca Budai
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Sandra Barnette
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Nancy Montez
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Sarah Huff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Rodrigues
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Melissa McCullough
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Vivian Noble
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Leslie Acevedo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.