Teams

That’s so in

2025 40&Over Women · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-25vs RadoffWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndrea Elliott / Donna Hack vs Mindy Turner / Lynda Otis6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKara Krueger vs Lisa Campagna6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Farah / Veronica Hotaling vs Sue VanderMeer / Gwenn Judge6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaureen Soderberg / Doreen Kingsley vs Melody Fredrickson / Jennifer Funiciello7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-23vs YablonskiWon 31
W#1 DoublesVeronica Hotaling / Kara Krueger vs Heather Harrick / Shirley Yablonski6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesFatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Emily Madan6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Farah / Doreen Kingsley vs Johanna Kmetz / Lisa Nelligan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichele Kellish / Donna Hack vs Sarah Elliott / Ruth Sikora4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-09vs RadoffWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Qiu / Maureen Soderberg vs Melody Fredrickson / Swati Murthy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKara Krueger vs Lisa Campagna6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesValerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott vs Jessica Viviano / Sue VanderMeer3-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs YablonskiWon 31
W#1 DoublesVeronica Hotaling / Emily Qiu vs Lisa Nelligan / Sarah Elliott6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKara Krueger vs Natalya Levin4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Soderberg / Donna Hack vs Shirley Yablonski / Ruth Sikora6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeidi Howard / Michelle Mashia vs Rajani Day / Ping Deng4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-18vs RadoffLost 13
W#1 DoublesKara Krueger / Michele Kellish vs Melody Fredrickson / Mindy Turner6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesFatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Helen MacDonald3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Farah / Maureen Soderberg vs Jessica Viviano / Swati Murthy6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott vs Lisa Campagna / Anita Pudusseri7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-11vs YablonskiLost 04
L#1 DoublesKara Krueger / Maureen Soderberg vs Sarah Elliott / Ruth Sikora6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Farah vs Emily Madan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Howard / Donna Hack vs Aija Leiponen / Natalya Levin3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Elliott / Valerie Clarke vs Rajani Day / Ping Deng4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-28vs RadoffWon 40
W#1 DoublesDonna Hack / Emily Qiu vs Helen MacDonald / Sharon Gerber6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesFatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Lisa Campagna6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Farah / Maureen Soderberg vs Mindy Turner / Andra Lee5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott vs Swati Murthy / Anita Pudusseri6-1, 6-4
2025-05-21vs YablonskiSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaureen Soderberg / Kara Krueger vs Aija Leiponen / Jenny Barnett6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesFatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Natalya Levin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Qiu / Heidi Howard vs Ruth Sikora / Sarah Elliott2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVeronica Hotaling / Michelle Farah vs Emily Madan / Shirley Yablonski6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEE/CONCILLA000000
2That’s so in08181433273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Michele Kellish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Donna Hack
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Kara Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.31
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Michelle Farah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Doreen Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Heidi Howard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Andrea Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Veronica Hotaling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Maureen Soderberg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.87
Valerie Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Emily Qiu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eunhee Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Farah + Veronica Hotaling12364% games+17.5% vs expected
Doreen Kingsley + Veronica Hotaling7158% games+9.2% vs expected
Donna Hack + Heidi Howard13855% games+9.0% vs expected
Emily Qiu + Eunhee Park4258% games+5.7% vs expected
Emily Qiu + Doreen Kingsley7457% games+3.2% vs expected
Valerie Clarke + Andrea Elliott222850% games−0.3% vs expected
Maureen Soderberg + Michelle Farah3352% games−0.4% vs expected
Heidi Howard + Veronica Hotaling5454% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Kellish
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Donna Hack
101W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Kara Krueger
56W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
70W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Michelle Farah
26W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Doreen Kingsley
65W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Elliott
73W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Maureen Soderberg
19W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Valerie Clarke
69W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Emily Qiu
88W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eunhee Park
42W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.