Teams

Women - Wednesday

2025 Escambia SOCIAL RS Quads · RS Quads - Summer

23 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for RS Quads - Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Corinne Lojo
published 3
2.44
2.42
Dakota DellaFera
published 2.5
2.42
Alicia Brizuela
published 2.5
2.38
Abigail Rick
published 2.5
2.29
Rebekah Calhoun
published
2.28
Christina Walden
published 2.5
Anna Boardman
published 2.5
Chelsey Swann
published 2.5
2.23
Sara Ratliff
published
2.21
Samantha Folkes
published
2.17
Matea Molina
published
2.14
Holly Kirby
published 2.5
2.11
Rebecca Wasdin
published
2.09
Linda Kuska
published
2.04
Carson Turner
published 2.5
2.02
Emily Van Der Linde
published 2.5
2.00
Bonnie Tingley
published 2.5
1.97
Allie Crisco
published 2.5
1.77
Jennifer Richardson
published
Vanessa Thibodeaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Rick + Vanessa Thibodeaux123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Corinne Lojo
6W–0L career · type D · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Allison Rutherford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anne Douglass Williams
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ann Marie Jasionowski
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.44
2.5
Dakota DellaFera
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Alicia Brizuela
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Abigail Rick
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
Rebekah Calhoun
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Christina Walden
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Anna Boardman
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Chelsey Swann
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Ratliff
5W–25L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Samantha Folkes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Matea Molina
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Holly Kirby
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Rebecca Wasdin
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Linda Kuska
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Carson Turner
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Emily Van Der Linde
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Bonnie Tingley
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Allie Crisco
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Jennifer Richardson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Vanessa Thibodeaux
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.