Teams

LCTA39/Lanphear/LTP/DI

2022 LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 4.0 Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-25vs LCTA39/Estes/DICLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeana Cumbie / Elisabeth Parkinson vs Amy Frain / Karen Bright2-6, 0-6
2024-02-25vs LCTA39/Cocchiola/SeabrookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Taggio / Evelyn Young vs Jacqueline Cocchiola / Martha Ross6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTiffany Bartholf / Kirsten Lanphear vs Kathy Orr / Suzanne Stebbins5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 39 & over Fall - Women - 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Annmarie Taggio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Tiffany Bartholf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Evelyn Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Kirsten Lanphear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Kimberly Ryan
published
3.60
Teresa McKellar
published
3.55
Marlene Koch
published
3.32
Elisabeth Parkinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Roseanne Orman
published
3.13
Juliet Still
published
3.08
Brenda Hodges
published 3.5
Patricia Schuster
published
Shannon Gallagher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Young + Annmarie Taggio4745% games+1.3% vs expected
Teresa McKellar + Tiffany Bartholf211850% games+0.3% vs expected
Teresa McKellar + Juliet Still1541% gamesnot enough data
Evelyn Young + Kirsten Lanphear1445% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Gallagher + Kirsten Lanphear2350% gamesnot enough data
Elisabeth Parkinson + Patricia Schuster044 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Ryan + Annmarie Taggio314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa McKellar + Elisabeth Parkinson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Taggio
77W–71L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Tiffany Bartholf
37W–43L career · 1 line in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Evelyn Young
56W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.64
Kirsten Lanphear
54W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Kimberly Ryan
47W–63L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Teresa McKellar
32W–45L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
Marlene Koch
27W–42L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Elisabeth Parkinson
40W–67L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Roseanne Orman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Juliet Still
22W–29L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brenda Hodges
22W–27L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Patricia Schuster
14W–52L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Gallagher
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.