Teams

PRC BLUE

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

14 players · average NTRP 4.11 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-12vs LTFC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen Irwin / Marcie Manuello vs Danielle Martines / Phuong Palmeiro6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaureen Butler vs Joy Herrin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Jorgensen / Tricia Draper vs Cristina Denezza / Colleen Frank6-2, 6-4
2022-09-05vs PCRK PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesShawn Blackwood / Amber Jorgensen vs Julie Whipple / Ann Habeger6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaureen Butler vs Sarah Bailey6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Irwin / Marcie Manuello vs Barbara Gentry / Jody Mumaugh6-4, 6-1
2022-08-29vs PRKR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesTricia Draper / Hilary Marano vs Krissy Hanna / Heather Stohlton6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMaureen Butler vs Barbara Helmkamp6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bennett / Shawn Blackwood vs Denise Dickson / Brenda Amundsen6-3, 6-3
2022-08-22vs SSLT GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Gresh / Shawn Blackwood vs Karie Lehigh / Debbie Lew6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaureen Butler vs Michelle Zelinger6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichele Regis / Darcy Hendricks vs Sarah Plagenza / Jody Walker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-15vs CACI YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesShawn Blackwood / Michele Regis vs Somsi Stringer / Angela Rose3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmber Jorgensen vs Karina Stevens6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTaryn Smallwood / Charlie Ghidotti vs Stacey Anderson / Jodi Little6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-08vs PCC PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bennett / Kristin Prosowski vs Stacey Hayward / Channing Woomer6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaureen Butler vs Janet Perry2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTaryn Smallwood / Tricia Draper vs Lisa Hossack / Dee Zimmerman6-2, 6-1
2022-08-01vs VCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarcy Hendricks / Ellen Irwin vs Susan Lawrence / Theresa Holyer6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmber Jorgensen vs Dana Henry6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bennett / Michele Regis vs Danelle Morgan / Barbara Weisberg6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hilary Marano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Amber Jorgensen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Taryn Smallwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Shawn Blackwood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Kristin Prosowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Meghan Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Michele Regis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Darcy Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ellen Irwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Stephanie Gresh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Charlie Ghidotti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Marcie Manuello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Butler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tricia Draper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcie Manuello + Taryn Smallwood8262% games+11.2% vs expected
Meghan Bennett + Stephanie Gresh15261% games+6.9% vs expected
Amber Jorgensen + Charlie Ghidotti10073% games+6.7% vs expected
Shawn Blackwood + Stephanie Gresh19463% games+6.3% vs expected
Marcie Manuello + Ellen Irwin14366% games+4.1% vs expected
Shawn Blackwood + Taryn Smallwood8161% games+1.6% vs expected
Charlie Ghidotti + Stephanie Gresh4551% games−3.1% vs expected
Charlie Ghidotti + Taryn Smallwood9359% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hilary Marano
44W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
114W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Taryn Smallwood
109W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Shawn Blackwood
125W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
Kristin Prosowski
45W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
Meghan Bennett
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Michele Regis
96W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Darcy Hendricks
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ellen Irwin
35W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Stephanie Gresh
87W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Charlie Ghidotti
131W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Marcie Manuello
56W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Maureen Butler
37W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Draper
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.