Teams

LNH:Luneau:Harrington

2022 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Day · 4.5 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-12vs ALG:Seaquins:Duckless:LeclercWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Elizabeth Straub vs Kimberly Duckless / Camille Madden6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beaton vs Karen Leclerc6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSandra Harrington / CariAnne Kreml vs Julie Kirklin / Denise Cascio Bolduc7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTara Kilar / Cathy Farrell vs Lianne Cronin / Dianthe Doldo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-12-05vs MTS:Siegel:Joslin-KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Elizabeth Straub vs Michelle Massa / Kelly Finn6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeredith Beaton vs Lori Siegel7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Laura Joslin-King / Joan Weir7-6, 6-3
2021-11-21vs ALG:Seaquins:Duckless:LeclercLost 13
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Lisa Senora Linder vs Kimberly Duckless / Camille Madden4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Beaton vs Dianthe Doldo4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCariAnne Kreml / Alisson Gallier vs Lianne Cronin / Nancy Bulkley6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandra Harrington / Dominika Langnerova vs Julie Kirklin / Denise Cascio Bolduc6-7, 3-6
2021-11-07vs MTS:Siegel:Joslin-KingWon 31
W#1 DoublesSandra Harrington / Juana Luneau vs Kelly Finn / Michelle Massa7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRebecca Roy vs Lori Siegel5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Beaton / Lisa Senora Linder vs Susannah Psomas / Janet Simmons6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Farrell / Sara Hamilton vs Laura Joslin-King / Andrea Pasciak4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-17vs MTS:Siegel:Joslin-KingWon 31
W#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Lisa Senora Linder vs Tammy Arado / Kelly Finn7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRebecca Roy vs Lori Siegel2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Harrington / Cathy Farrell vs Joan Weir / Deborah Panzica6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlisson Gallier / Sara Hamilton vs Susannah Psomas / Andrea Pasciak6-2, 6-3
2021-10-03vs ALG:Seaquins:Duckless:LeclercWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Elizabeth Straub vs Elizabeth Pleva / Nancy Bulkley6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJuana Luneau / Meredith Beaton vs Kimberly Duckless / Dianthe Doldo6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Harrington / Lisa Senora Linder vs Julie Kirklin / Karen Allard6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Laurie Dannison
published 5
4.39
CariAnne Kreml
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.34
Mary Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Elizabeth Straub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Juana Luneau
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Sandra Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Meredith Beaton
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.07
Alisson Gallier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Dominika Langnerova
published 4.5
4.04
Cathy Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.89
Lisa Senora Linder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Roy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sara Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Beaton + Cathy Farrell5261% games+8.1% vs expected
Juana Luneau + Sandra Harrington613056% games+2.6% vs expected
Lisa Senora Linder + Juana Luneau32764% games+1.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Straub + Mary Carroll331258% games+0.5% vs expected
Juana Luneau + Cathy Farrell404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Laurie Dannison
99W–61L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.54
5
CariAnne Kreml
121W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
4.39
Mary Carroll
164W–112L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Elizabeth Straub
124W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Juana Luneau
220W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
Sandra Harrington
132W–80L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
Meredith Beaton
102W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Alisson Gallier
31W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Dominika Langnerova
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Cathy Farrell
100W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
Lisa Senora Linder
104W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Rebecca Roy
69W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Hamilton
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.