Teams

BOUS:Bousquet Belles:Ellis/silverstein

2026 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-20vs LTC:ACE BANDAGES:Trompke/StauberLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Babich / Dana Niedzielska vs Sue Trompke / Valerie Stauber5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEileen Masiero / Janice Tynan vs Patricia Sullivan / Cheryl Ruell7-5, 4-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Ryan / Leslie Weil vs Marie Sattler / Dawn Fleury2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesEileen Masiero / Dana Niedzielska vs Noreen Desroches / Elizabeth Varner2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Ryan / Leslie Weil vs Lynn Paul / Patricia Coffey0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Hughes / Kathryn Casella vs Jennifer Ayre / Janet Compton1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs BAY: High Fives:MacCollLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanice Tynan / Holly Hughes vs Marianne Vinal / Mary Lou Laurenza0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdeline Ellis / Kathryn Casella vs Mika Inoue / Mary Tudryn5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobyn Huban / Elisa Mishory vs Lucy Hartry / Mary Husted4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJanice Tynan / Elisa Mishory vs Barbara Beaudoin / Elizabeth Varner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Babich / Roberta Silverstein vs Jennifer Ayre / Ellen Donnelly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Cooper / Leslie Weil vs Janet Compton / Carol York1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Babich / Eileen Masiero vs Barbara Beaudoin / Jennifer Ayre7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanice Tynan / Dana Niedzielska vs Elizabeth Varner / Erica Weida6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Newmark / Adeline Ellis vs Noreen Desroches / Maureen Ratigan6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-14vs BAY: High Fives:MacCollLost 12
L#1 DoublesEileen Masiero / Elisa Mishory vs Carol MacColl / Mika Inoue4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Babich / Dana Niedzielska vs Lucy Hartry / Mary Husted6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobyn Huban / Janice Tynan vs Evelyn Villa / Mina Safizadeh6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs LTC:ACE BANDAGES:Trompke/StauberLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoberta Silverstein / Janice Tynan vs Marie Roncalli / Pam Brenner-Newton0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobyn Huban / Elisa Mishory vs Becky Ayers / Dawn Fleury2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Cooper / Marlene Reil vs Marie Sattler / Kim Counter4-6, 3-6
2025-12-14vs BAY: High Fives:MacCollLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoberta Silverstein / Eileen Masiero vs Carol MacColl / Susan Anderson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Babich / Elisa Mishory vs Marianne Vinal / Mary Lou Laurenza2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Casella / Marlene Reil vs Mina Safizadeh / Lucy Hartry3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-22vs LTC:ACE BANDAGES:Trompke/StauberLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Masiero / Janice Tynan vs Nicole Malloy / Becky Ayers3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSheri Baruch / Kathryn Casella vs Pam Brenner-Newton / Marie Roncalli6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoberta Silverstein / Michelle Ryan vs Sue Trompke / Patricia Sullivan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC:ACE BANDAGES:Trompke/Stauber8120722221
2BAY: High Fives:MacColl7220722217
3LTC:Tennis Ballers:Beaudoin/Desroches27101737254
4BOUS:Bousquet Belles:Ellis/silverstein1842348297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adeline Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Andrea Newmark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Eileen Masiero
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.20
Dana Niedzielska
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Linda Babich
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Janice Tynan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Robyn Huban
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elisa Mishory
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Holly Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jeannette Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Casella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Weil
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marlene Reil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roberta Silverstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sheri Baruch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Huban + Eileen Masiero3740% games−4.8% vs expected
Sheri Baruch + Adeline Ellis2438% games−14.0% vs expected
Janice Tynan + Robyn Huban0732% gamesnot enough data
Linda Babich + Eileen Masiero3253% gamesnot enough data
Linda Babich + Robyn Huban044 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Huban + Elisa Mishory044 matchesnot enough data
Janice Tynan + Adeline Ellis033 matchesnot enough data
Janice Tynan + Roberta Silverstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adeline Ellis
9W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Newmark
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Eileen Masiero
12W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Dana Niedzielska
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Linda Babich
36W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Janice Tynan
16W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.06
Robyn Huban
8W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Elisa Mishory
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Holly Hughes
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeannette Cooper
58W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathryn Casella
13W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Weil
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marlene Reil
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Ryan
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberta Silverstein
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheri Baruch
10W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.