← Teams

SWW-KTAC-Schmid

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

1 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Dayna Guizzetti
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
Results6 ties
2023-11-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDayna Guizzetti / James Crutchfield vs Josh Pinyerd / Kim Hood6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-19Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDayna Guizzetti / James Crutchfield vs Esther Kim / Cody Leimback6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPaul Koessler / Dayna Guizzetti vs Alisdair Horn / Candace Hines6-3, 6-1
2023-11-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPaul Koessler / Dayna Guizzetti vs Kim Hood / Davin Hanton7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-29Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTurner Hibbs / Dayna Guizzetti vs Nick Jarvis / Zhi George6-3, 6-1
2023-10-01Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDayna Guizzetti / Turner Hibbs vs Mark Mettler / Chanel Nielsen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Dayna Guizzetti
68W–19L career
1%99%1%
4.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.