Teams

CScott (Charlotte Country Club)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmilie Pandullo vs Rebekah Jackson6-4, 6-3
2022-04-29vs MBrown (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Chapman / Emilie Pandullo vs Rosalie ORourke / Tamara Carlson6-2, 7-6
2022-04-15vs MMascia/Nichols (Carmel)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCassell FitzHugh / Emilie Pandullo vs Heidi Friedman / Gina Arado6-3, 6-1
2022-04-08vs TWilson (Bridgehampton)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEmilie Pandullo vs Jamie Thomas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-01vs KFore/JGluff (Springfield)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmilie Pandullo / Cassell FitzHugh vs Jennifer Gluff / Nancy Moll4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-25vs PPhelan/LClancy (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmilie Pandullo / Bridget Browne vs Laura Clancy / Katherine Smith6-2, 7-6
2022-03-04vs RChow/CGreco (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Chapman / Emilie Pandullo vs Susan Claire / Rosalie Sentlinger6-0, 6-0
2022-02-25vs LWallace/BHoff (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmilie Pandullo / Nicole Grenier vs Missy Goodrich / Kristine Wahr6-7, 3-6
2022-02-18vs ADonathan/AGudin (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmilie Pandullo vs April Porter7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Emilie Pandullo
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.92
Meredith Chapman
published
3.39
Christina Brunnemer
published 3.5
3.29
Allison Abbott
published 3.5
Bridget Browne
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Schaaf
published 3.5
3.19
Tracey Cook
published
3.18
Christen Scott
published 3.5
Melissa Lovett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Brunnemer + Amy Schaaf134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilie Pandullo
33W–5L career · type S · 9 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
4.16
Meredith Chapman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
3.5
Christina Brunnemer
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Allison Abbott
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Bridget Browne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Schaaf
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Tracey Cook
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christen Scott
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Melissa Lovett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.