Teams

SD LT Balboa TC/ Wolpert

2025 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-23vs SD LT Balboa TC/ AgraLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Edgar Vigil vs Joel Corrales / Jeff Hines3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lara / Gil Squire vs Keondre Taylor / Josh Yu6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSamnang Rim / Spondee Shenn vs Soda Lam / Kyle Granali6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-12vs SD LT Balboa TC/ AgraWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Christopher Barrera vs Jeff Hines / Zachary Hayes6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesWoody WU / Soon Chye Ho vs Cesar Torres / Francis Lomibao6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSpondee Shenn / Samnang Rim vs Josh Yu / Jeff Strack6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Ali Moosa
published 4
3.85
Jeffrey Wolpert
published 4
3.83
Gregory Gerardo
published 4
3.75
Christopher Barrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Isaac Truong
published
3.53
Soon Chye Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Gil Squire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Edgar Vigil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
George Benakos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Daniel Lara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Wheat
published 3.5
3.17
Spondee Shenn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samnang Rim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Woody WU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Moosa + Jeffrey Wolpert314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Moosa
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Jeffrey Wolpert
24W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Gregory Gerardo
41W–43L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christopher Barrera
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Isaac Truong
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Soon Chye Ho
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Gil Squire
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Edgar Vigil
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
George Benakos
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Lara
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Wheat
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Spondee Shenn
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Samnang Rim
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Woody WU
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.