Teams

A5 KRA Smash Girls Green/Turner

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs A4 WOCC HaasWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Fleck / Krista Quinby vs Kelly Gregory / Laura Vetter6-3, 6-3
2023-05-21vs A7 RMC SweeneySplit 11
L#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Melanie Eccard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Cynthia Muncy1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Grace Kim5-7, 1-6
2023-04-22Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Margaret Burke1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Ariel Trimiew6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Whitney Sandridge
published
3.52
Lauren Turner
published
3.50
Krista Quinby
published
3.45
Charlotte Shirey
published 3.5
3.31
Katherine Fleck
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.29
Sara Winterhoff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Wendy Daniel
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
3.02
Christine Martine
published 3.5
3.02
Laurie Barnes
published
2.94
Kerri Green
published
2.90
Kaarin Gordon
published
Elizabeth Toohers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Fleck + Sara Winterhoff141645% games−4.7% vs expected
Laurie Barnes + Kerri Green033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Sandridge
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Lauren Turner
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Krista Quinby
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Charlotte Shirey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Katherine Fleck
64W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Sara Winterhoff
97W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Wendy Daniel
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Laurie Barnes
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.02
Kerri Green
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Kaarin Gordon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Elizabeth Toohers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.