Teams

EDG-Higgins

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-10-17vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) KimLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Higgins / Joel Higgins vs Sandra Jerez / Jason LeeKeenan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Redding / Ken Redding vs Jyotsna Ambarukhana / John McDonald3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Adkins / James Adkins vs Melissa Igel / Adam Milam2-6, 1-6
2020-10-11vs FC-PetriucSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShelley Chapman / Rick Chapman vs Anca Popoaei / Adrian Fanaru6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoel Higgins / Sophie Fawcett vs Dana Cozmei / Cezar Ungureanasu7-6, 6-3
2020-10-03vs TCSP-TonkinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Keller / Roy Higashi vs Hwashing Heyworth / Sam Heyworth1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Higgins / Joel Higgins vs Amy Tonkin / Tyler Tonkin7-5, 6-4
2020-09-26vs ETC-AcuarioLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoy Higashi / Pamela Keller vs Colin Kho / Alissa Williams1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Redding / Ken Redding vs Zhe Zhang / Ellen Acuario4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Adkins / James Adkins vs Zhe Yang / Amber Shi2-6, 4-6
2020-09-20vs ETC-Punishers-YangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShelley Chapman / Rick Chapman vs Mei Yang / Michael Beals6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSophie Fawcett / James Adkins vs Yen Kim / Alex Kim1-6, 4-6
2020-09-05vs CAC/SL-JungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Keller / Roy Higashi vs Kristin Bibbs / Kenneth Chukwu1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Chapman / Rick Chapman vs Brad Raynor / Sandy Rauen6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-TopSpinners-Krishnamoorthy601625106
2ETC-Titans 6.0-Box601536117
3MC-6.0 Mx-Ngo60144887
4MC-6.0 Red Team-Jay511448118
5PSC-Chen511449118
6AYTC-The Craziest Ones-Louie5114411127
7ETC-Acuario5113511129
8TCSP-Out of the Blue-Chou5112613121
9AYTC (OUTDOORS) Kim5111717157
10BTA-Lalime4213510126
11FC-Petriuc4213512144
12BTA-Mixed-Day4211719141
13ETC-Buck4211719162
14Lower Woodland-Love All-Hardie4210820160
15BC-Sedghinasab3381023168
16BTA-Smith3371124176
17ETC-Mixed Fun-Gardai249917156
18CAC/SL-Top Guns-Wanat249919153
19TCSP-Double Trouble-Arron249920159
20BETC-mix it up-Shutt2471123167
21ETC-Punishers-Yang2471124186
22AYTC (OUTDOORS) Ma2481024177
23Lower Woodland-Tuesdays with Joey-Goyal2471125169
24TCSP-Tonkin2461225164
25AYTC-Team 110-Asatiani2461226179
26AYTC (OUTDOORS) Apple Orchard All Stars 2-Frondozo2461226188
27TCSP-Mixed-Stuart2451328197
28BC-Brandenfels1551327184
29TCSP-Lerer1551328175
30TCSP-Vincent/Lu1541429186
31ETC-Onu1541430192
32EDG-Higgins0661226195
33TCSP-Net Setters-James0631531198
34FC-Basha 6.00621633211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Shelley Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Roy Higashi
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Joel Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ken Redding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sophie Fawcett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Amy Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Susanna Wilken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Mary Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Pamela Keller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Wendy Redding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
James Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Higgins + Amy Higgins172747% games−2.8% vs expected
Wendy Redding + Ken Redding91046% games−6.6% vs expected
James Adkins + Mary Adkins21434% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Keller + Roy Higashi033 matchesnot enough data
Joel Higgins + Sophie Fawcett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Chapman
121W–102L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Roy Higashi
281W–155L career · 9 lines in 2021
1%89%10%
3.33
3
Joel Higgins
103W–88L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Ken Redding
40W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Sophie Fawcett
67W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Amy Higgins
90W–112L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Susanna Wilken
85W–77L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Mary Adkins
34W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
2.5
Pamela Keller
41W–85L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%44%56%
2.52
3
Wendy Redding
30W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.47
James Adkins
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.