Teams

Brown-Serves You Right-Bentwater

*2026 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-22vs Brengel-Set To Win-Woodlands ParksLost 05
L#1 DoublesDanielle Mendes / Mary Page vs Dunia Sires / Robyn Schapiro3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Nelson vs Monica Patel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Kassuba / Stacee Verkon vs Leigh Anne Seale / Karen Seefeldt6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana LaDoe / Cathy Karka vs Natashia Douglas / Tina Kirby3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Brown / Nicole Antonvich vs Theresa Schlichter / Johnalynn Leibovich2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-15vs Gwynn-Lucky Strings-WoodlandsWon 32
W#1 DoublesDiana LaDoe / Stacee Verkon vs Amy Atnipp / Paige Erkmann5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesConnie Frazier vs Sara Jones4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLora Mays / Danielle Mendes vs Becky Corbin / Myriam Velasco6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Karka / Carol Viktorin vs Lara Crouch / Janet Beckman6-2, 6-0
L#4 DoublesLisa Brown / Maria Nelson vs Yvette Gwynne / Christy Drickamer5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Kassuba / Stacee Verkon vs Hillary Zuniga / Dunia Sires6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesConnie Frazier vs Tara Brengel3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiana LaDoe / Carol Viktorin vs Tina Kirby / Gretchen Williamson1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLora Mays / Danielle Mendes vs Robyn Schapiro / Theresa Schlichter6-0, 7-6
W#4 DoublesLisa Brown / Maria Nelson vs Leigh Anne Seale / Loree Heckt6-1, 6-4
2026-03-25vs Gwynn-Lucky Strings-WoodlandsLost 23
L#1 DoublesStacee Verkon / Lisa Kassuba vs Laura Joseph / Kelly King6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesConnie Frazier vs Kellie Andreas7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Brown / Diana LaDoe vs Lara Crouch / Jana Gray3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelen Haig / Carol Viktorin vs Becky Corbin / Yvette Gwynne5-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesNicole Antonvich / Maria Nelson vs Christy Drickamer / Janet Beckman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-23vs Brengel-Set To Win-Woodlands ParksLost 23
L#1 DoublesDiana LaDoe / Cathy Karka vs Tara Brengel / Gretchen Williamson0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesConnie Frazier vs Nicole Luca4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacee Verkon / Lisa Kassuba vs Hillary Zuniga / Natashia Douglas7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLora Mays / Danielle Mendes vs Monica Patel / Loree Heckt6-1, 7-5
L#4 DoublesLisa Brown / Nicole Antonvich vs Robyn Schapiro / Theresa Schlichter3-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs Gwynn-Lucky Strings-WoodlandsWon 32
W#1 DoublesCathy Karka / Mary Page vs Yvette Gwynne / Jana Gray6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesConnie Frazier vs Kellie Andreas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLora Mays / Danielle Mendes vs Christy Drickamer / Lara Crouch6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Brown / Helen Haig vs Amy Atnipp / Kelly King1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesNicole Antonvich / Maria Nelson vs Becky Corbin / Sara Jones4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Cathy Karka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Lora Mays
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Danielle Mendes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Connie Frazier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Stacee Verkon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.67
Maria Nelson
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.65
Helen Haig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Kassuba
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Diana LaDoe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Carol Viktorin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Nicole Antonvich
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kassuba + Stacee Verkon3651% games+11.0% vs expected
Danielle Mendes + Lora Mays5554% games+4.0% vs expected
Diana LaDoe + Stacee Verkon2444% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Antonvich + Maria Nelson134 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Karka + Diana LaDoe033 matchesnot enough data
Helen Haig + Carol Viktorin033 matchesnot enough data
Diana LaDoe + Carol Viktorin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Karka
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lora Mays
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Danielle Mendes
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Connie Frazier
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Stacee Verkon
17W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Maria Nelson
10W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Helen Haig
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lisa Kassuba
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Diana LaDoe
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
2.56
3
Carol Viktorin
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Nicole Antonvich
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.