Teams

Dallas/JB/AP

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-16vs McGee/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#1 DoublesMadison Matthews / Steven Matthews vs Tevin McGee / Elizabeth Cox6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindi Wade / Richard Daniel vs Tyler Lloyd / Hannah Chambers6-0, 6-3
2026-07-11vs Chandler/JB/APCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Matthews / Steven Matthews vs Stephanie Romero / Hunter Eaves7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTanner Patrom / Megan Ragsdale vs Reginald Chandler / Leah Willett6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Daniel / Morgan Davis-Daniel vs Brandon Gates / Mandy Folden7-5, 6-1
2026-07-06vs Parker/JB/3OaksLost 12
W#1 DoublesMadison Matthews / Steven Matthews vs Jordan Adams / Richard Milton6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Morgan Davis-Daniel vs Mollie Vance / Dylan Vance3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCherry Dallas / Andrew Dallas vs Chris Evins / Sarah Abbott7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-20vs McGee/JB/3OaksWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Matthews / Madison Matthews vs Katie Reeves / Jacob Reeves6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Ragsdale / Tanner Patrom vs Emanuel Mcgee / Karysta Sturges6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Daniel / Morgan Davis-Daniel vs Tevin McGee / Maggie Barnes6-1, 6-3
2026-06-18vs Chandler/JB/APCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCherry Dallas / Richard Daniel vs Leah Willett / Sam Hosman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Matthews / Megan Ragsdale vs Mandy Folden / Hunter Eaves6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Dallas / Lindi Wade vs Stephanie Romero / Landen Patterson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs Parker/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesTanner Patrom / Lindi Wade vs Dylan Vance / Mollie Vance0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Cherry Dallas vs Michael McEuen / Jordan Adams7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Matthews / Madison Matthews vs Cory Kyle / Sarah Abbott5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dallas/JB/AP4211715155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Megan Ragsdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Richard Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Andrew Dallas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Cherry Dallas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Madison Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Lindi Wade
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Tanner Patrom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Morgan Davis-Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherry Dallas + Richard Daniel8258% games+1.8% vs expected
Morgan Davis-Daniel + Richard Daniel314 matchesnot enough data
Cherry Dallas + Andrew Dallas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Ragsdale
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Richard Daniel
26W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Andrew Dallas
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cherry Dallas
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Madison Matthews
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lindi Wade
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tanner Patrom
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Morgan Davis-Daniel
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.