Teams

CPD

2022 USTA 55 & Over Mx Doubles League · 9.0 Mixed Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-01vs NJDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Paul Elliott vs Harry Douglas / Carol Hammond6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rakoczy / Mark Lewis vs Andrew Hoffman / Diana Natole6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Brink / Jayne Snyder vs Susan Dixon Thompson / Robert Weise5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-01vs NJDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Michael Moyer vs Rudolf van Mol / Deborah Berger6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rakoczy / Mark Lewis vs Alan Rosenberg / Amy Fryer6-0, 7-5
2022-04-30vs NJDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Paul Elliott vs Robert Weise / Amy Fryer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rakoczy / Mark Lewis vs Rudolf van Mol / Deborah Berger6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJayne Snyder / Tom Brink vs Dan McGrath / Susan Dixon Thompson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-30vs NJDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Michael Moyer vs Harry Douglas / Carol Hammond3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Miller / Paul Elliott vs Andrew Hoffman / Diana Natole2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rakoczy / Michael Davis vs Alan Rosenberg / Vera Lawson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPD40102888
2NJD0421022129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Tom Brink
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.39
Paul Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.34
Laura Athey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Michael Moyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.90
Jennifer Rakoczy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jayne Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Mark Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Athey + Michael Moyer7164% games+2.1% vs expected
Tom Brink + Laura Athey5260% games−2.1% vs expected
Mark Lewis + Jennifer Rakoczy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tom Brink
249W–144L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
4.41
Paul Elliott
68W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Laura Athey
124W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Michael Moyer
63W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Jennifer Rakoczy
211W–143L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Jayne Snyder
25W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Lewis
58W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.