Teams

Zimmer/18/8.5/CM/CP

2024 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 8.5 NO (18&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-14vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Westholz / Matthew Bolton vs Anthony MacAluso / Ian Sigl6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-08vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Kelly / Nicholas Hansel vs Theodore Kennedy / Carter Lundin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColin Meyer / Gordie Verrett vs Justin Goings / STEPHAN WOHLSCHLAEGER4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulian Richards / Matthew Bolton vs Matthew Jackson / Randy Rossignol3-6, 5-7
2024-09-30vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcLost 12
L#1 DoublesCristian Galleguillos / Peter Kelly vs Eric Landry / Anthony MacAluso4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Stahl / Colin Meyer vs Hayden Bashinski / Clayton Kallenborn1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Zimmer / Nicholas Hansel vs Ian Sigl / STEPHAN WOHLSCHLAEGER5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-23vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcLost 12
L#1 DoublesPat Neely / Peter Kelly vs Eric Landry / STEPHAN WOHLSCHLAEGER2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Zimmer / Nicholas Hansel vs Clayton Kallenborn / Anthony MacAluso5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Bolton / David Stahl vs Randy Rossignol / Ian Sigl6-4, 6-2
2024-09-18vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcLost 03
L#1 DoublesColin Meyer / Gordie Verrett vs Eric Landry / STEPHAN WOHLSCHLAEGER4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Abbott / Sam Grayson vs Anthony MacAluso / Jay Meyers3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Zimmer / Matthew Bolton vs Solomon Crouch / Clayton Kallenborn7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-26vs Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRcLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Westholz / Pat Neely vs Hayden Bashinski / Eric Landry3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMatthew Bolton / David Stahl vs Carter Lundin / Timothy Dang6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCristian Galleguillos / Nathan Zimmer vs Clayton Kallenborn / Anthony MacAluso7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 NO (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goings/18/8.5/CM/TTRc5112616160
2Zimmer/18/8.5/CM/CP1561226182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
David Stahl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.05
Peter Kelly
published
4.00
Andrew Westholz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Matthew Bolton
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.89
Cristian Galleguillos
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.88
Ashley Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Pat Neely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
John Zimmer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
Colin Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gordie Verrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Nicholas Hansel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Nathan Zimmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julian Richards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Grayson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Bolton + David Stahl8067% games+12.7% vs expected
Nathan Zimmer + Cristian Galleguillos5455% games+7.3% vs expected
Matthew Bolton + Andrew Westholz5059% games+6.5% vs expected
David Stahl + John Zimmer4159% games−5.4% vs expected
John Zimmer + Nicholas Hansel224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Bolton + Cristian Galleguillos303 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Bolton + Pat Neely123 matchesnot enough data
Gordie Verrett + Colin Meyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Stahl
45W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
4.08
Peter Kelly
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Andrew Westholz
33W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Matthew Bolton
47W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Cristian Galleguillos
24W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Ashley Abbott
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
Pat Neely
61W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
John Zimmer
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Colin Meyer
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Gordie Verrett
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Hansel
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Nathan Zimmer
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Julian Richards
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sam Grayson
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.