Teams

TCSP-Tonkin

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-07vs FC-PetriucLost 03
L#1 DoublesArpana Goel / Matthew Johnson vs Monica Boris / Adrian Fanaru7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Pauldine / Tyler Tonkin vs Irina Petriuc / Mihai Petriuc0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Johnson / James Barrett vs Dana Cozmei / Radu Serbanescu4-6, 4-6
2020-10-11vs ETC-Punishers-YangWon 21
W#1 DoublesHwashing Heyworth / Sam Heyworth vs Anne Coley / Mark Seko7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJames Barrett / Sherri Johnson vs Jennie Douglas / Jason Halcomb6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Alley Krabak / Matthew Johnson vs Thuong Pham / Kenneth Carter6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-10-03vs EDG-HigginsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHwashing Heyworth / Sam Heyworth vs Pamela Keller / Roy Higashi6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Tonkin / Tyler Tonkin vs Amy Higgins / Joel Higgins5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Barrett / Kim Kelly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-09-26vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) KimLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Tonkin / Tyler Tonkin vs Jason LeeKeenan / Pranom Leephan-Williams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Kelly / James Barrett vs Peter Stroble / Christina Kim1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Alley Krabak / Sam Heyworth vs Sandra Jerez / Patrick Supanc6-2, 6-1
2020-09-20vs ETC-AcuarioLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Pauldine / Alex Cohen vs Seth Yount / Tram-Anh Pham1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHwashing Heyworth / Sam Heyworth vs Anabela Torrealba / Sudheer Raj Motakatla6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesArpana Goel / James Barrett vs Diego Mendivil Pindter / Kaci Pham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-12vs CAC/SL-JungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Tonkin / Tyler Tonkin vs Daniel Jung / Kristin Bibbs1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSherri Johnson / James Barrett vs John Collier / Kristine Benum6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-TopSpinners-Krishnamoorthy601625106
2ETC-Titans 6.0-Box601536117
3MC-6.0 Mx-Ngo60144887
4MC-6.0 Red Team-Jay511448118
5PSC-Chen511449118
6AYTC-The Craziest Ones-Louie5114411127
7ETC-Acuario5113511129
8TCSP-Out of the Blue-Chou5112613121
9AYTC (OUTDOORS) Kim5111717157
10BTA-Lalime4213510126
11FC-Petriuc4213512144
12BTA-Mixed-Day4211719141
13ETC-Buck4211719162
14Lower Woodland-Love All-Hardie4210820160
15BC-Sedghinasab3381023168
16BTA-Smith3371124176
17ETC-Mixed Fun-Gardai249917156
18CAC/SL-Top Guns-Wanat249919153
19TCSP-Double Trouble-Arron249920159
20BETC-mix it up-Shutt2471123167
21ETC-Punishers-Yang2471124186
22AYTC (OUTDOORS) Ma2481024177
23Lower Woodland-Tuesdays with Joey-Goyal2471125169
24TCSP-Tonkin2461225164
25AYTC-Team 110-Asatiani2461226179
26AYTC (OUTDOORS) Apple Orchard All Stars 2-Frondozo2461226188
27TCSP-Mixed-Stuart2451328197
28BC-Brandenfels1551327184
29TCSP-Lerer1551328175
30TCSP-Vincent/Lu1541429186
31ETC-Onu1541430192
32EDG-Higgins0661226195
33TCSP-Net Setters-James0631531198
34FC-Basha 6.00621633211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arpana Goel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Amy Tonkin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Sam Heyworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Sherri Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Hwashing Heyworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Brian Kelly
published 3
2.76
Christine Alley Krabak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Tyler Tonkin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
James Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Pauldine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hwashing Heyworth + Sam Heyworth121849% games+1.6% vs expected
Amy Tonkin + Tyler Tonkin51345% games−21.3% vs expected
Sherri Johnson + James Barrett1452% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Pauldine + Tyler Tonkin033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Pauldine + James Barrett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arpana Goel
44W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amy Tonkin
62W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sam Heyworth
53W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sherri Johnson
65W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Hwashing Heyworth
68W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Brian Kelly
57W–35L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Christine Alley Krabak
34W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Tyler Tonkin
10W–32L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
James Barrett
10W–27L career · 6 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.46
Elizabeth Pauldine
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.