Teams

LATA40/Feaster/LCTC

2025 Fall 40 & Over-LATA · Fall Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-11vs LATA40/Williams/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCollins Baker / Linda Sims vs Patsy Boggs / Carol Busbee6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBatina Feaster / Susan Molair vs NAKIA ROBINSON / Tina Houser6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesM Brinkley / Katherine Taylor vs Patricia Williams / Janice Prioleau6-1, 6-4
2025-10-14vs LATA40/Burton/LCTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesVandrea Lang / Julie Coyle vs Allyson Jones / Lisa Ewart0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSheree King vs Helen Cupertino0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Sims / Collins Baker vs JJ Burton / Reka Corley3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBatina Feaster / Susan Molair vs Jennifer Pownall / Malissa Hulon6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Collins Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ellen Floyd
published 3
2.72
Vandrea Lang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Susan Molair
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Julie Coyle
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
M Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Katherine Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Batina Feaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kelly Holliday
published
Nicole Palmer
published
Sheree King
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Collins Baker
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Ellen Floyd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vandrea Lang
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Susan Molair
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Julie Coyle
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
M Brinkley
43W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Katherine Taylor
3W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Batina Feaster
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
Kelly Holliday
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Palmer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheree King
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.