Teams

JRoss-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-12vs GSmith-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Jennifer Moore2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Donna Bauman6-2, 6-3
2025-06-18vs GSmith-HRLost 01
L#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Ginny Kirk Andrews3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-11vs GSmith-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Jennifer Moore6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Beth Huebner6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Donna Bauman5-4
2025-06-04vs GSmith-HRLost 01
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Beth Huebner4-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs GSmith-HRLost 02
L#2 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Julia Howard1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Amy Beth Kessinger2-6, 2-6
2025-05-24vs GSmith-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Leslie Boesch0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Amy Beth Kessinger1-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs GSmith-HRLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmanda Linke vs Donna Bauman6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Leslie Boesch2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Katie Neal5-7, 1-6
2025-05-07vs GSmith-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Julia Howard0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Amanda Linke
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Chace Ogle
published 4
3.98
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.92
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.79
Justyne Ross
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.52
Betsy Shane
published 4
Keelin Mcloughlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.7% vs expected
Valerie Acre + Amanda Linke5063% gamesnot enough data
Hannah Silverstein + Betsy Shane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Linke
46W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Chace Ogle
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Valerie Acre
131W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Betsy Shane
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Keelin Mcloughlin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.