Teams

Buttonwood - Roux

2022 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-30vs Blvd - Cyr/HazeltonWon 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Penny Boulden vs Allison Ritter / Lana Heinze6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Deborah LeClaire vs Kristin Hazelton / Anita Venner6-2, 7-5
2022-06-23vs IRMSL/SDeGaetanoLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Lisa Thiesen / Renee' Palmer1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPenny Boulden vs Victoria Kendall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-12vs IRMSL/SDeGaetanoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Beth Daly vs Sharon DeGaetano / Christina Lovera1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPenny Boulden / Deborah LeClaire vs Julianna Degaetano / Susan Gore6-1, 6-2
2022-06-09vs Blvd - Cyr/HazeltonWon 10
W#3 DoublesViktorija Roux / Sandy Palma vs Lana Heinze / Kristin Hazelton7-6, 6-3
2022-05-19vs Blvd - Cyr/HazeltonLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Theresa Dubiel vs Lana Heinze / Anita Venner6-7, 5-7
2022-05-12vs IRMSL/SDeGaetanoLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Deborah LeClaire vs Lisa Thiesen / Susan Gore3-6, 6-7
2022-04-28vs Blvd - Cyr/HazeltonLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Daly / Penny Boulden vs Leslie London / Wendy Orthober7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-21vs IRMSL/SDeGaetanoLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Regan Chatel vs Mary Murray / Susan Gore3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Abigail Flood
published 4.5
3.88
Regan Chatel
published
3.84
Sandy Palma
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elisabeth Smith
published 4
3.69
Theresa Dubiel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
Penny Boulden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dubiel + Sandy Palma4353% gamesnot enough data
Penny Boulden + Sandy Palma213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abigail Flood
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Theresa Dubiel
49W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Marie-Paule Cafmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Penny Boulden
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.