Teams

SE 5.5W 18&Over Bergeron

2025 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 5.5

9 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01vs Selma WilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMurphy Shifferd / Taylor Hale vs Alicia Beers / Noelle Rich6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Thomas / Sydney Wood vs Kendall Smith / Mallory Kelley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rowell Jones / Laigan Bearden vs Mary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden7-5, 6-4
2025-09-29vs Selma WilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dobbs / Maegan Austin vs Molly Williams / Kendall Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKennedy Bergeron / Murphy Shifferd vs Alicia Beers / Noelle Rich5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor Hale / Elizabeth Burford vs Mary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden7-5, 6-4
2025-09-22vs Selma WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKennedy Bergeron / Sydney Wood vs Mary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rowell Jones / Laigan Bearden vs Kendall Smith / Mallory Kelley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs Selma WilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Hale / Murphy Shifferd vs Molly Williams / Mallory Kelley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Thomas / Maegan Austin vs Alicia Beers / Noelle Rich6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Dobbs / Laigan Bearden vs Morgan Bearden / Kendall Smith6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jennifer Dobbs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kennedy Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Jennifer Rowell Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Taylor Hale
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Elizabeth Burford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laigan Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maegan Austin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Murphy Shifferd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sydney Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Rowell Jones + Kennedy Bergeron7363% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Dobbs
31W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Kennedy Bergeron
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Jennifer Rowell Jones
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Taylor Hale
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Elizabeth Burford
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laigan Bearden
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maegan Austin
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Murphy Shifferd
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sydney Wood
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.