Teams

CCouto-HR

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 9:30 AM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 15 9:00 AM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 22 9:00 AM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
Sep 29 9:30 AM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Oct 6 9:00 AM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
2026-09-01vs MLong.40.7.5C-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Kelly Travis vs Donna Holtaway / Lisa Andrew6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJulie Spearman / Jaime Parker vs Yvonne Acker / Mary T Long6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Mary Fortin vs Thi My Tho Rogers / Araya Coffey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-25vs EHoover.40C-CCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Hsu / Laura Privalle vs Katie Elder / Katherine Leib5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMimi Miles / Mary Feger vs Tammy Chin / Tammy Sasser6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAbigail Hatcher / Kay Mabe vs Nancy Sickel / Lisa Montague6-2, 6-1
2026-08-11vs EHoover.40C-CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Abigail Hatcher vs Tammy Chin / Lynda Noga6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Couto / Rebecca Walsh vs Katherine Leib / Katie Elder1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Kelly Travis vs Lisa Montague / Beth Clark4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Beth Huebner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Mary Feger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Kay Mabe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Julie Spearman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Carrie Couto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Laura Privalle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Mimi Miles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Abigail Hatcher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Sheana Funkhouser
published
3.20
Kelly Travis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Jaime Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Lisa Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Mabe + Julie Spearman13853% games+9.6% vs expected
Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+8.2% vs expected
Mary Feger + Carrie Couto171354% games+4.1% vs expected
Carrie Couto + Elizabeth Wyngaarden171547% games−0.5% vs expected
Julie Spearman + Carrie Couto12759% games−4.2% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Elizabeth Wyngaarden91150% games−5.1% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Mary Fortin6753% gamesnot enough data
Mary Feger + Julie Spearman8363% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Huebner
37W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Mary Feger
125W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Julie Spearman
167W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Carrie Couto
162W–176L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.59
Laura Privalle
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mimi Miles
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–133L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sheana Funkhouser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Jaime Parker
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lisa Hsu
91W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.