Teams

Double Trouble

2022 55 & Over Women · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEW JERSEY REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-10vs SpinderellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Mone / Kate Seaman vs Lisa Engel / Betty Sapir7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesManisha Degaonkar / Auriel Watts vs Earnecia Hasben-Powers / Takayo Futamura6-7, 3-4
W#3 DoublesJeanne Harootunian / Yi-Fan Hu vs Hazel-Ann Rodney / Donna McPherson7-6, 4-2
2022-04-03vs Mackay Sunday FundayLost 12
W#1 DoublesCathleen Ferns / Sheila McLean vs Diane Harrison / Juanita Tam6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSandra Haut / Stacey Marotta vs Linda Hammond / Cheryl Pernell5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Harootunian / Hsiaoli Ma vs Linda Fiumefreddo / Sarah MacKay2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-27vs Gino's GalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesManisha Degaonkar / Stacey Marotta vs Sharon Becker / Carla Gaeta2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Coradini / Lia Seto vs Sarah Karchere / JANET van MOL5-7, 1-6
2022-03-20vs SpinderellasLost 12
L#1 DoublesManisha Degaonkar / Yi-Fan Hu vs Cheryl-Anne Bliss / Deborah Fafian3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStacey Marotta / Auriel Watts vs Priscilla Wood / Takayo Futamura2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHsiaoli Ma / Jeanne Harootunian vs Suzanne Carraby-Jones / Earnecia Hasben-Powers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-13vs Gino's GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila McLean / Cathleen Ferns vs Marie Collazo / Theresa Sauta1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYi-Fan Hu / Jane Mone vs Patricia Pike / Donna Nagel1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacey Marotta / Hsiaoli Ma vs JANET van MOL / Elizabeth Egan0-6, 4-6
2022-03-06vs Mackay Sunday FundayLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Haut / Yi-Fan Hu vs Rosita Stith / Kimberly Ajavananda3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesManisha Degaonkar / Ellen Lewis vs Sarah MacKay / Victoria Volyn5-7, 1-6
2022-02-27vs SpinderellasLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Seaman / Manisha Degaonkar vs Cheryl-Anne Bliss / Betty Sapir2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Haut / Janet Himstead vs Lisa Engel / Alice Chao0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Marotta / Hsiaoli Ma vs Hazel-Ann Rodney / Bibi Lipton3-6, 2-6
2022-02-13vs Mackay Sunday FundayLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila McLean / Kate Seaman vs Sarah MacKay / Victoria Volyn7-6, 2-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Himstead / Manisha Degaonkar vs Rosita Stith / Kimberly Ajavananda2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCathleen Ferns / Hsiaoli Ma vs Juanita Tam / Louise Arkel5-7, 0-6
2022-02-06vs Gino's GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila McLean / Kate Seaman vs Sharon Becker / Marie Collazo1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathleen Ferns / Lia Seto vs Liz Christian / Jennifer Duffield0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Coradini / Hsiaoli Ma vs JANET van MOL / Michele Gioia1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kate Seaman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Sheila McLean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Yi-Fan Hu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Janet Himstead
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Cathleen Ferns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Stacey Marotta
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Hsiaoli Ma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Manisha Degaonkar
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Auriel Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ellen Lewis
published
Jeanne Harootunian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lia Seto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Coradini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Haut
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathleen Ferns + Sheila McLean7459% games+7.4% vs expected
Janet Himstead + Kate Seaman2450% games−2.1% vs expected
Janet Himstead + Sandra Haut1638% gamesnot enough data
Janet Himstead + Hsiaoli Ma3351% gamesnot enough data
Sheila McLean + Kate Seaman2449% gamesnot enough data
Maria Coradini + Lia Seto1440% gamesnot enough data
Janet Himstead + Jeanne Harootunian224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Coradini + Hsiaoli Ma044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Seaman
108W–169L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Sheila McLean
35W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Yi-Fan Hu
85W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Janet Himstead
80W–115L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cathleen Ferns
75W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Stacey Marotta
14W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Hsiaoli Ma
58W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Manisha Degaonkar
94W–181L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Auriel Watts
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ellen Lewis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Harootunian
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lia Seto
50W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Coradini
12W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Haut
3W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.