Teams

Rebecca

Tri-Level -Spring · Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-01vs Christie WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNicolle Welch / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Marlys Morton / Lucille Abe6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Denton / Karen Loeffler vs Daniella DeLozier / Fledz Lastimoso0-6, 0-6
2022-03-27vs CathyLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Nicolle Welch vs Catherine Stone / Dana Griffin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Paige Thorne vs Stacia Green / Triin Minton0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Denton / Karen Savage vs Song Bliss / Susan Brunner1-6, 1-6
2022-03-27vs Christie WLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicolle Welch / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Lucille Abe / Trena Rairdon6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Thorne / Zareena Clendaniel vs Jessie Lief / Marlys Morton3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSandra Denton / Karen Savage vs Cynthia Henie / Fledz Lastimoso2-6, 1-6
2022-03-26vs Allie BWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Nicolle Welch vs Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller / April Korshin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Paige Thorne vs Conita Mullett / Kima Kimura6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Savage / Sandra Denton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-25vs CathyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Zareena Clendaniel vs Catherine Stone / Stacia Green6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Thorne / Karen Loeffler vs Triin Minton / Dana Griffin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Denton / Karen Savage vs Song Bliss / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Nicolle Welch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Zareena Clendaniel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Karen Loeffler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karen Savage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Denton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Savage + Sandra Denton1731% games−13.8% vs expected
Karen Loeffler + Zareena Clendaniel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nicolle Welch
65W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
163W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
58W–96L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Karen Savage
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Denton
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.