Teams

KY/LOU/DUNN

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-15vs KY/LOU/PZREWORSKI/LANELost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Warren / Jennifer Petrie vs Christine Przeworski / Mei Dai1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJody Walters / Terri Saylor vs Michelle Whitehouse / Kathleen Lane1-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs KY/LOU/POLTER/DALTONWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Mazzella / Terri Saylor vs Mary Shively / Caroline Oneill0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie McCoy / Nancy Buechler vs Mashelle Kiggins / Tammy Pollock0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Warren / Jennifer McAdams vs Mary Conder / Cathy Morris5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-01vs KY/LOU/COOK/WEIDMANWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie McCoy / Carol Warren vs Jennifer Hoertz / Kathy Lesmeister3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly French / Linda Slye vs Mary Cook / Erin Sexton3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLouise Todd / Terri Saylor vs Sandra Littles / Kyra Frederick6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Linda Nuss
published
3.21
Jennifer McAdams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jody Walters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Nancy Buechler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Debbie McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Phylis Jasnoff
published
3.01
Carol Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Terri Saylor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gina Mazzella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Slye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Todd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Nuss
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jennifer McAdams
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jody Walters
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nancy Buechler
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Debbie McCoy
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Phylis Jasnoff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Carol Warren
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Terri Saylor
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Gina Mazzella
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Slye
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Louise Todd
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.