Teams

SFV - L'Esprit de Tennis

2025 Mixed 18+ Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 6.0 MxD

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-30vs SFV - Racketeers 6.0MxWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Scott Carrithers vs Meghrik Isagholi / Gonzalo Mendez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Gagik Trdatyan vs Kiera Nowacki / June Ip6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs SFV - TA Mixed 6.0-2025Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDoree Shafrir / Fardad Ordoobadi vs Diep Ho / Jose Ochoa0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Prasad Devarshi vs Su Li / Changlin Wu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs SFV - WC Ball BreakersLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Gillham / Judith Ortiz vs Jake Kasarjian / Diana Massaria5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Robinson / Scott Carrithers vs Sally Miller / Chris Fragoso4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGagik Trdatyan / Lena Tsodykovskaya vs Mitch Bennett / Zenaida Siojo4-6, 6-3
2025-02-09vs SFV - Scholland Garros 6.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Prasad Devarshi vs Yena Hong / Jun Tan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-25vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew 6.0MxWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Scott Carrithers vs Phuong Vance / Brandon Sierra6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-18vs SFV - RanchersLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Carrithers / Anita Spraggs vs Mauricio Solis / Carol Stevenson4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Anita Spraggs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Doree Shafrir
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Judith Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Scott Carrithers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
David Gillham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Pamela Bentley
published
2.52
Prasad Devarshi
published
2.48
Grace Gillham
published
Fardad Ordoobadi
published
Gagik Trdatyan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lena Tsodykovskaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anita Spraggs
72W–83L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Doree Shafrir
93W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Judith Ortiz
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Scott Carrithers
13W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
David Gillham
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Prasad Devarshi
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Grace Gillham
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Fardad Ordoobadi
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gagik Trdatyan
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lena Tsodykovskaya
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.