Teams

WRAC-Simmons

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-07vs SRC-ChessarLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathleen McIver / Sheryl Jeffries vs Stephanie Butler / Judy Chessar2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-11-06vs SC-TombariLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen McIver / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Cynthia Duren / Linda Heyamoto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShari Tastad / Julie Stirling vs Teri Munson / Catherine Hann4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSelena Hernandez / Amanda Wray vs Voni Tombari / Jeneen Barratt4-6, 1-6
2021-11-06vs YTC-MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesShari Tastad / Julie Stirling vs Angela Stewart / Angie Richardson6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Trish Simmons vs Beata Miller / Cindy Bowen-Lorrain2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Dinwiddie / Sheryl Jeffries vs Lisa Watkins / Dana Lybeck6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-11-05vs SC-BoinskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheryl Jeffries / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Terri Dahm / Susan Boinski7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Amanda Wray vs Laura Temby / Judy Stone3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShari Tastad / Julie Stirling vs Jan Hardenbrook / Trudy Jacobsen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Miller31841199
2WRAC-Simmons135718128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Kathleen McIver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Amanda Wray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Stirling
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Dinwiddie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Selena Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shari Tastad
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sheryl Jeffries
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Trish Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen McIver + Trish Simmons8750% gamesnot enough data
Shari Tastad + Julie Stirling5555% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Kathy Dinwiddie3247% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Jeffries + Kathy Dinwiddie134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen McIver
56W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Amanda Wray
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Stirling
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Dinwiddie
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Selena Hernandez
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shari Tastad
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Jeffries
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trish Simmons
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.