Teams

ETC:ETC/ATCBigDawgs:Toothaker

2021 ME Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-13vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 20
W#2 SinglesEvan Wigton-Jones vs Joshua Graceffa0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Contino / Bryan Lewis vs Chris Bowring / Steven Buxton6-1, 6-3
2021-06-13vs RFC:APEXAces:PickeringWon 20
W#2 SinglesEvan Wigton-Jones vs Jason Ouellette6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBryan Lewis / Jim Contino vs Alan Jordan / Trevor Thaxter7-6, 6-4
2021-05-23vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 20
W#2 SinglesEvan Wigton-Jones vs Michael Emmert6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBryan Lewis / David Szewczyk vs Chris Bowring / Steven Buxton6-1, 6-3
2021-05-23vs RFC:APEXAces:PickeringWon 10
W#3 DoublesBryan Lewis / Evan Wigton-Jones vs Philip Villiotte / Ross Cram6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs RFC:APEXAces:PickeringLost 01
L#3 DoublesBryan Lewis / David Szewczyk vs Philip Villiotte / Thaddeus St John4-6, 5-7
2021-05-08vs RFC:TBD:BowringSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBryan Lewis vs Patrick Casey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNevin Williams / David Szewczyk vs Steven Buxton / Chris Bowring6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-18vs RFC:APEXAces:PickeringLost 02
L#1 DoublesBryan Lewis / Nevin Williams vs GEORGE WATTS / Adam Raudonat6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEvan Wigton-Jones vs Sean Maguire3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-18vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 20
W#2 DoublesNevin Williams / Bryan Lewis vs Patrick Casey / Chris Bowring6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEvan Wigton-Jones vs Christopher Jones6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:ETC/ATCBigDawgs:Toothaker62291130298
2RFC:APEXAces:Pickering62261434331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Evan Wigton-Jones
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.73
Bryan Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.20
David Szewczyk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alan Toothaker
published
Benjamin Beverly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Wigton-Jones + Bryan Lewis4350% gamesnot enough data
David Szewczyk + Bryan Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Evan Wigton-Jones
22W–29L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Bryan Lewis
59W–45L career · type M · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
David Szewczyk
62W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Alan Toothaker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Benjamin Beverly
6W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.