Teams

CCV Reifsnider

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-12vs ACAC JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Hayes Blackburn vs Julie Rison / Tracey Watson6-0, 6-1
2023-07-11vs Westwood Combs / PokrywkaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Windy Campbell vs Jennifer White / Elizabeth Keith6-3, 6-3
2023-07-07vs Stonehenge BullWon 10
W#2 DoublesLia Mooney / Amanda Galanti vs Karen Grimes / Maureen Sisti6-4, 6-2
2023-07-05vs MTC HilbertLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Robin Reifsnider vs Kati Shick / Olena Turner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-30vs ACAC Cheatham / HoeferWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Lane Mosby vs Carol Hoefer / Kathie Naylor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-28vs WOCC Moehling / StringerWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Hayes Blackburn vs Darlene Moehling / Sandy Pisano6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Lane Mosby vs Kelly Gregory / Laura Vetter6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
3.80
Amanda Galanti
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.77
Hayes Blackburn
published
3.34
Karen Gilmore
published
3.28
Windy Campbell
published
3.25
Kirsten Boyd
published
3.23
Lia Mooney
published
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsti Goodwin + Amanda Galanti224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Gilmore + Kirsten Boyd213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Benevento
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Amanda Galanti
85W–37L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Hayes Blackburn
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Karen Gilmore
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Windy Campbell
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Kirsten Boyd
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Lia Mooney
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.