Teams

RCC GREEN

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - DEN · MIXED 7.5 - ITA

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-22vs BRMST GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Subry / Michele Gosselin vs Erich Wagner / Lynn Knickerbocker2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMadison Subry / Philip Wang vs Adrian Clarke / Melissa Clarke6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Jeffrey Johnson vs Christine Babcock / Coby Babcock6-3, 6-4
2021-08-15vs CVTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Wang / Michele Gosselin vs Paul Vander Veer / Sally Vander Veer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRondi Herman / Murray Herman vs Thomas Tessier / Terry Tessier5-7, 4-6
2021-08-09vs NJ BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Jeffrey Johnson vs Laura Pivovar / Bryan Pivovar2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Subry / Cecil Sunder vs Kira Moore / Tomas Mendez2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMadison Subry / John Subry vs Jennifer Stiebeling / Henry Carson1-6, 2-6
2021-08-08vs BRMST REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCecil Sunder / Karen Boisnard vs Jacy Bowers / Brad Thurman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Rosen / Jeffrey Johnson vs Sean ONeil / Stacey Mari3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Turner / Pamela Subry vs Robert Tedesco / Laura Tedesco2-6, 1-6
2021-08-01vs NJ ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Boisnard / Cecil Sunder vs Dan Bottinelli / Kimberly Bonczynski6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Gosselin / John Subry vs Rebecca Grace / Scott Snyder6-3, 6-3
2021-07-18vs BRMST GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesRondi Herman / Murray Herman vs Erich Wagner / Lynn Knickerbocker4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Subry / Philip Wang vs Noelle Anthony / Brian Anthony6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Subry / Christopher Turner vs Christine Babcock / Coby Babcock6-2, 6-4
2021-07-11vs CVTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCecil Sunder / Karen Boisnard vs Paul Vander Veer / Sally Vander Veer6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRondi Herman / Murray Herman vs Thomas Tessier / Terry Tessier1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · MIXED 7.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APR GOLD7017416173
2LTFC YELLOW4313817173
3GCC TEAL43101127203
4CP NAVY34111023199
5RCC GREEN3491224190
6SKY ORANGE3481329209
7CP GOLD2591227206
8GLDN BLUE2581328194
9BRMST YELLOW0731838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Philip Wang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Michele Gosselin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cecil Sunder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.13
John Subry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Cindy Ronlov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Boisnard
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Subry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elisabeth Rosen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Madison Subry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Murray Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rondi Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Subry + Pamela Subry21140% gamesnot enough data
John Subry + Michele Gosselin123 matchesnot enough data
Murray Herman + Rondi Herman033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Boisnard + Cecil Sunder213 matchesnot enough data
Philip Wang + Pamela Subry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Wang
44W–30L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Michele Gosselin
99W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cecil Sunder
19W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Subry
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cindy Ronlov
112W–72L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Karen Boisnard
79W–69L career · 7 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
Pamela Subry
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
Elisabeth Rosen
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Madison Subry
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Murray Herman
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rondi Herman
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.