Teams

Wood, Barbara

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28vs Sanders, KimberlySplit 22
W#1 DoublesTara Gatti / Patty Jensen vs Julie Drake / Vicky Knudson6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNatalie Atwater vs Brenda Foree7-5, 4-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Fuller / Janet Gose vs Mary Kenady / Bannon Carney3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Deborah Weixeldorfer vs Melanie Cohavi / Megan Baker4-6, 4-5
2021-03-21vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcia Moroney / Natalie Atwater vs Kris Gronau / Christina Gondring6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wood / Tara Gatti vs Beth Caffrey / Jeannette Baumler6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Gose / Patricia Mitchell vs Angela Fredericks / Cindy Kochersperger7-5, 2-4, 1-0
2021-03-14vs Krishna, AngelLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyann Redmond / Veronica Wolff vs Angel Krishna / Julie Gibson3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLori Blinn vs Theresa Danforth Costello1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTara Gatti / Patricia Mitchell vs Judy Yi / Missy Kotre1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Fuller / Deborah Weixeldorfer vs Laura Fox / Angela Joffe1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-03-07vs Thompson, LauraLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Atwater / Barbara Wood vs Kathleen Duffy / Rebecca Kowalczyk6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarcia Moroney / Deborah Weixeldorfer vs Robin Ayers / Laura Thompson4-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Fuller / Veronica Wolff vs Jane Slavik / Michelle Waller2-6, 2-6
2021-02-28vs Bennett, ConnieLost 13
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Natalie Atwater vs Debbie Kuegler / Tricia Boushka2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Stadlman vs Natalie Neal6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatty Jensen / Veronica Wolff vs Nancy Ifft / Ronda Harness6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Fuller / Ann Cronkhite vs Cathy Czir / Karen Rogers1-6, 5-7
2021-02-21vs Edwards, AliceLost 04
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Natalie Atwater vs Alice Edwards / Kristin Heurtin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLori Blinn vs Stacie Temple4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVeronica Wolff / Patty Jensen vs Susan McConkey / Natalie Hartman6-7, 3-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Fuller / Ann Cronkhite vs Keely Schneider / Marti Huffman1-6, 0-6
2021-02-14vs Nelson, CydneyWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Natalie Atwater vs Cynthia Petrie / Bridget Smithmier6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLori Blinn vs Stacy Porto2-6, 3-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTara Gatti / Marcia Moroney vs Eileen Grebowiec / Kristi LaMothe7-6, 3-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Mitchell / Janet Gose vs Kathy Hawley / Christina Porto7-6, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Ryann Redmond
published
3.52
Marcia Moroney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Lori Blinn
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.32
Natalie Atwater
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Barbara Wood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Tara Gatti
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Stephanie Stadlman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Patty Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Ann Cronkhite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Julie Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Janet Gose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julia Romanin
published
Veronica Wolff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Wood + Natalie Atwater8953% games+7.5% vs expected
Natalie Atwater + Janet Gose3356% games+1.8% vs expected
Natalie Atwater + Julia Romanin4352% games+1.6% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Ann Cronkhite4642% games−0.8% vs expected
Barbara Wood + Patty Jensen3545% games−1.7% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Patty Jensen21041% games−2.6% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Janet Gose3642% games−4.1% vs expected
Barbara Wood + Julia Romanin1448% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryann Redmond
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
Marcia Moroney
66W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Lori Blinn
136W–190L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
Natalie Atwater
100W–76L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Wood
55W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Gatti
37W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Stephanie Stadlman
19W–44L career · 1 line in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Patty Jensen
31W–82L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Ann Cronkhite
55W–107L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
Julie Fuller
36W–110L career · 5 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.46
Deborah Weixeldorfer
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Gose
50W–50L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julia Romanin
56W–52L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Veronica Wolff
10W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.