Teams

EM ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-27vs HG REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndy Engeman / Tyler Lindvall vs Bill Clifford / Mark Custer7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Giesen / Ethan Lew vs Stephan Tuchfeld / Nate Amack6-3, 6-2
2024-05-13vs KC-CC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndy Engeman / JOHN INGRAHAM vs Bryan DesMarteau / Scott Adams3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTom Giesen / Stephen Rohs vs Audie Rubin / Blake Adams2-6, 3-6
2024-05-06vs LTFC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Horn / Andy Engeman vs Lael Fray / Hugo Serri7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid McLain / Tom Giesen vs James DeLurgio / Jonathan Sinkin6-4, 6-4
2024-04-29vs HFII REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesAaron Walter / Tom Giesen vs Gil Adamowski / Bradley Cole6-4, 6-0
2024-04-22vs HRCA-N BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesTom Giesen / Troy Fornstrom vs Ross Billows / Gary Dong6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs WC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid McLain / Andy Engeman vs Tim Royal / Jeffrey Burton3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Ricky Casady
published
2.73
Drew Kelleher
published
2.69
Troy Fornstrom
published
2.69
David McLain
published 3
2.61
Andy Engeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
JOHN INGRAHAM
published
2.52
Tyler Lindvall
published
2.35
Tom Giesen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ethan Lew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Engeman + Tom Giesen1438% gamesnot enough data
JOHN INGRAHAM + Drew Kelleher224 matchesnot enough data
Andy Engeman + Troy Fornstrom213 matchesnot enough data
Troy Fornstrom + Tom Giesen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ricky Casady
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
Drew Kelleher
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Troy Fornstrom
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
David McLain
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Andy Engeman
24W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
JOHN INGRAHAM
13W–28L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
Tyler Lindvall
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Tom Giesen
28W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
Ethan Lew
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.