← Teams

GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brooke Kuerbis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Laura Shier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Nozomi Bray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Kim Hevia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Megan Clifford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSarah Robertson / Paula Conway vs Pat Kaplan / Stephany Mo6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Karen Kraus vs Linda Humphrey / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKim Hevia / Nozomi Bray vs Sadhana Kapur / Margaret Convery2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Nozomi Bray vs Kaoru Nelson / Lisa Hockman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Kay Hallmark / Margaret Sivertsen6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Megan Clifford vs Angie Lee / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNozomi Bray / Sarah Robertson vs Vera Vos / Kathleen Budnick6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Shier / Megan Clifford vs Jana Hirst / Devrie Brennan7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Mary Head / Charleen Straub7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-27Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesSarah Robertson / Kim Hevia vs Betty Roux / Jill Boyce6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Brooke Kuerbis vs Kusum Mehndiratta / Catherine Huang6-3, 6-3
2024-10-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKathy Ramsey / Paula Conway vs Janae Pyle / Nancy Williams6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt vs Gretchen Wagner / Wendy Whitsell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Hevia / Laura Shier vs Dory Simons / Barbara Gram6-4, 6-4
2024-10-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Rebecca Roberts vs Susan Elmer / Kim Tellin6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Shier / Megan Clifford vs Jill Boyce / Catherine Huang7-6, 6-3
2024-09-29Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Karen Kraus vs Gena Martinez / Kelly Asbridge6-3, 6-3
2024-09-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNozomi Bray / Sarah Robertson vs Judith Kobin / Stephany Mo6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt vs Kathy Ottesen / Linda Humphrey6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brooke Kuerbis
94W–31L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Paula Conway
48W–75L career
5%95%0%
3.17
3.5
Laura Shier
22W–55L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%88%12%
2.95
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%99%1%
2.83
3
Kim Hevia
3W–42L career
0%99%1%
2.80
3
Megan Clifford
65W–60L career
7%93%0%
2.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.