Chappaqua Swim and Tennis
2025 18&Over Women · 3.0
16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule9 played
i
Flight standings29 teams · 3.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1LifeTime GARNET | 0 | 7 | 16 | 135 |
| 2New Rochelle Racquet Club: Slice Girls | 0 | 7 | 20 | 172 |
| 3Chappaqua Swim and Tennis | 0 | 7 | 29 | 193 |
| 4Mount Kisco Country Club - Lob Legends | 0 | 7 | 29 | 203 |
| 5Amackassin Club 2.5ers | 0 | 7 | 32 | 213 |
| 6County Tennis The Volley Girls | 0 | 7 | 32 | 208 |
| 7Birchwood Swim & Tennis: Love-All Legends | 0 | 7 | 37 | 222 |
| 8Ossining Zingers | 0 | 7 | 37 | 231 |
| 9Manursing Island Club: Island Aces | 0 | 8 | 8 | 119 |
| 10Yonkers Tennis Center - Causing a Racket | 0 | 8 | 9 | 145 |
| 11CRRC Racqueteers | 0 | 8 | 10 | 114 |
| 12Birchwood Swim and Tennis- The Slice Girls | 0 | 8 | 15 | 155 |
| 13Pleasantville Tennis Club- No Faults | 0 | 8 | 17 | 176 |
| 14Sportime HI - Hit Squad | 0 | 8 | 18 | 185 |
| 15TIA: Deuces Wild | 0 | 8 | 19 | 167 |
| 16Saw Mill Topspins | 0 | 8 | 19 | 145 |
| 17Sleepy Hollow: Sleepy and Rally 2.5 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 180 |
| 18New Rochelle Racquet Club: Nice Racquettes | 0 | 8 | 21 | 170 |
| 19West Nyack Swim & Tennis Club: Volley Girls | 0 | 8 | 23 | 193 |
| 20Club Fit Briarcliff Tuf Luv | 0 | 8 | 23 | 183 |
| 21Whip 2.5 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 198 |
| 22WTC: 2.5 18+ Love & Deuces | 0 | 8 | 24 | 184 |
| 23Sportime MBYC -Armada | 0 | 8 | 26 | 208 |
| 24Lakeside Field Club | 0 | 8 | 26 | 199 |
| 25Pelham Country Club - The Honey Deuces | 0 | 8 | 28 | 207 |
| 26NYAC: Alley Cats | 0 | 8 | 31 | 226 |
| 27Yonkers Tennis Center - Lucky Strings | 0 | 8 | 33 | 242 |
| 28Hampshire 18+ 2.5 Team | 0 | 8 | 36 | 242 |
| 29Pleasantville Tennis Club: Party at the Net | 0 | 8 | 42 | 262 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Sari Bourne + Ilana Perlman | 6–4 | 57% games | +9.8% vs expected |
| Rachel Gerstein + Dana Yahr | 4–1 | 55% games | +9.1% vs expected |
| Nicole Feig + Ilana Perlman | 6–1 | 58% games | +8.0% vs expected |
| Stephanie Saletan + Nicole Feig | 8–6 | 54% games | +1.3% vs expected |
| Sari Bourne + Lindsay Finkler | 3–5 | 49% games | +0.0% vs expected |
| Lindsay Finkler + Leah Alani | 5–6 | 51% games | −0.3% vs expected |
| Leah Alani + Ilana Perlman | 3–2 | 52% games | −0.7% vs expected |
| Sari Bourne + Leah Alani | 15–8 | 52% games | −3.8% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.